Amnesty International calls on states to stop predatory, anti-rights order from taking hold in pivotal moment for humanity

The State of the World’s
Human Rights

Amnesty International’s Annual Report 2025/26

  • Predatory attacks on multilateralism, international law and civil society marked 2025
  • The alternative on offer is a racist, patriarchal, unequal and anti-rights world order
  • Protesters, activists and global bodies are working to resist, disrupt and transform

The world is on the brink of a perilous new era, driven by powerful states’, corporations’ and anti-rights movements’ assaults on multilateralism, international law and human rights, Amnesty International warned today upon launching its annual report, The State of the World’s Human Rights. States, international bodies and civil society must reject the politics of appeasement and collectively resist these attacks to prevent this new order from taking hold, the organization said in its assessment of the human rights situation in 144 countries.

“We are confronting the most challenging moment of our age. Humanity is under attack from transnational anti-rights movements and predatory governments determined to assert their dominance through unlawful wars and brazen economic blackmail,” said Amnesty International’s Secretary General, Agnès Callamard.

“For years, Amnesty International has denounced the gradual disintegration of human rights in every part of the world, warning of the consequences of flagrant rule-breaking by governments and corporate actors. We’ve also demonstrated time and again how double standards and selective compliance with international law have weakened the multilateral system and accountability.

This is a direct assault on the foundations of human rights and the international rules-based order by the most powerful actors for the purpose of control, impunity and profit.

Amnesty International’s Secretary General, Agnès Callamard

“What marks this moment as fundamentally different is that we’re no longer documenting erosion around the system’s edges. This is a direct assault on the foundations of human rights and the international rules-based order by the most powerful actors for the purpose of control, impunity and profit.

“The spiralling conflict in the Middle East is a product of this descent into lawlessness. Following the initial unlawful US-Israeli attacks in violation of the UN Charter, which triggered Iran’s indiscriminate retaliation, the conflict has quickly morphed into an open warfare against civilians and civilian infrastructure, exacerbating the already catastrophic suffering of people across the region. It is now engulfing countries around the world, impacting populations everywhere, and threatening the livelihood of millions. This is what happens when the norms, institutions and legal framework painstakingly built to safeguard humanity are hollowed out for the purpose of domination.”

“Amnesty’s 2025 annual report moves beyond warning of imminent breakdown to documenting a collapse now underway, and exposing its devastating consequences for human rights, global stability and the lives of millions in 2026 and beyond. It calls on states around the world to urgently reject the politics of appeasement embraced in 2025, overcome fear, and resist in words and actions the construction of a predatory world order.”

Get the Amnesty International Annual Report 2025/26

Download

Predatory attacks are accelerating the destruction of international law

The State of the World’s Human Rights,and Amnesty International’s documentation so far this year,detail pervasive crimes under international law and mounting attacks on the international justice system, which are gravely harming the foundations that underpin human rights globally.

Israel has maintained its genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, despite the October 2025 ceasefire agreement, and its system of apartheid over Palestinians, while accelerating the expansion of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and taking steps toward annexation. Israeli authorities have increasingly allowed or encouraged settlers to attack and terrorize Palestinians with impunity, and prominent officials have praised and glorified violence against Palestinians, including arbitrary arrests and the torture of detainees.

The United States of America has committed over 150 extrajudicial executions by bombing boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific, and carried out an act of aggression against Venezuela in January 2026. Russia has intensified its aerial attacks on critical civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, while Myanmar’s military used motorized paragliders to drop explosive munitions on villages last year, killing dozens of civilians, including children.

The United Arab Emirates has fuelled the conflict in Sudan by providing advanced Chinese weaponry to the Rapid Support Forces, who seized control of El Fasher last October after an 18-month siege of the city and committed mass civilian killings and sexual violence. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the M23 armed group, with the active support of Rwanda, captured the cities of Goma and Bukavu and unlawfully killed civilians and tortured detainees.

In early 2026, the USA and Israel’s unlawful use of force against Iran, in violation of the UN Charter, has triggered retaliatory Iranian strikes on Israel and Gulf Cooperation Council countries, while Israel has escalated its attacks on Lebanon. From the killing of over 100 children in an unlawful US strike on a school in Iran, to the devastating attacks by all parties on energy infrastructure, the conflict has endangered the lives and health of millions of civilians and threatens to inflict vast, predictable and long-term civilian and environmental harm, impacting access to energy, healthcare, food and water across an already turbulent region and beyond.

In Afghanistan, the Taliban escalated its predatory policies against the female population, with further bans prohibiting them from education, work and freedom of movement, while in Iran, the authorities massacred protesters in January 2026, in what was likely the most lethal such repression for decades.

The USA, Israel and Russia further undermined international accountability mechanisms, and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in particular, last year. The Trump administration enacted sanctions against ICC staff, collaborators and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, while Russian courts issued arrest warrants against ICC officials. Several other states withdrew or announced their intention to withdraw from the Rome Statute and treaties banning cluster munitions and anti-personnel mines.

To appease aggressors is to pour fuel on a fire that will burn us all and scorch the future for generations to come.

Agnès Callamard

The vast majority of states have been unwilling or unable to consistently denounce predatory acts by the USA, Russia, Israel or China, or to chisel out diplomatic solutions. The European Union and most European states appeased US assaults on international law and multilateral mechanisms. They have failed to take meaningful action to stop Israel’s genocide or end the irresponsible arms and technology transfers fuelling crimes under international law around the world. They have also been unwilling to enact blocking statutes to protect the targets of US sanctions, including on ICC judges and prosecutors. Italy and Hungary declined to arrest individuals subject to ICC warrants in their territory, while France, Germany and Poland implied they would do the same.

“World leaders have been far too submissive in the face of attacks on international law and the multilateral system. Their silence and inaction are inexcusable. It is morally bankrupt and will bring nothing but retreat, defeat and the erasure of decades of hard-fought human rights gains. To appease aggressors is to pour fuel on a fire that will burn us all and scorch the future for generations to come,” said Agnès Callamard.

“Some may be tempted to dismiss the system built over the last 80 years as nothing but an illusion. This is to ignore the hard-fought achievements towards the recognition of universal rights, the adoption of multiple international conventions and national laws protecting against racial discrimination and violence against women, enshrining the rights of workers and trade unions, and recognizing the rights of Indigenous Peoples. It is to forget the poverty addressed, the reproductive rights strengthened and the justice delivered when states chose to uphold the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  

“The political and economic predators, and their enablers, are declaring the multilateral system dead not because it’s inefficient but because it’s not serving their hegemony and control. The response is not to proclaim it an illusion or beyond repair, but to confront its failures, end its selective application and keep transforming it so that it’s fully capable of defending all people with equal resolve.”

A young boy surrounded by rubble, sitting on top of an unexploded missile.

A Palestinian boy sits on an unexploded missile in the Al-Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City on 12 November 2025.
Looking up at a tall building with a large fire raging as firefighter climbs up a ladder towards two people leaning out of one of the windows.

Ukrainian firefighters work to extinguish a blaze in a residential building after Russian shelling hit the city of Kostiantynivka on 22 August 2025.

Ramped-up assaults on civil society spread around the world

The proliferation of attacks on civil society and social movements deepened in 2025, with sustained efforts to silence and disempower human rights defenders, organizations and dissenters spreading to almost every part of the world.

Authorities in Nepal and Tanzania were particularly brazen in their unlawful use of lethal force to repress protests expressing political and socio-economic grievances. The governments of Afghanistan, China, Egypt, India, Kenya, the USA and Venezuela, among others, also violently repressed protests, criminalized dissent through counterterrorism and security laws, or used abusive policing tactics, enforced disappearances or extrajudicial executions.

In the United Kingdom, authorities proscribed Palestine Action, a direct-action protest network primarily targeting Israeli arms manufacturers and their subsidiaries, under overly broad counterterrorism laws and arrested more than 2,700 people for peacefully opposing the ban. The UK High Court ruled this unlawful in February 2026. The government is appealing the decision.

Turkish authorities detained hundreds of peacefully protesters after the arrest of Istanbul mayor and presidential candidate Ekrem İmamoğlu, who is among over 400 people facing politically motivated prosecution under alleged corruption charges.

US authorities launched an unlawful clampdown on migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, committing unnecessary and excessive use of force, racial profiling, arbitrary detention, and practices that amounted to torture and enforced disappearance. In Latin America, states such as Ecuador, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela adopted or reformed legal frameworks that impose disproportionate controls on civil society organizations directly impacting their ability to operate, access resources, support communities and defend human rights. 

Many governments, facilitated by corporate actors, used spyware and digital censorship to restrict freedom of expression and the right to information. US authorities used AI-powered surveillance tools to target foreign students expressing solidarity with Palestinians with arrest and deportation. Serbia’s government used spyware and digital forensics tools against student protesters, civil society and journalists. Kenyan authorities systematically deployed technology-facilitated repression tactics, including online intimidation, threats, incitement to hatred and unlawful surveillance, to suppress youth-led protests.

The USA, Canada, France, Germany and the UK, among others, announced or enacted sweeping cuts to international aid budgets, despite knowing they would likely result in millions of avoidable deaths, and in several cases while committing to massive parallel hikes in military expenditure. This has had a catastrophic impact on NGOs’ efforts to advance press freedom, climate resilience, and gender justice, to protect refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, and to provide healthcare and sexual and reproductive rights.

Many states continued to resist reining in the aggressive tax avoidance and evasion by billionaires and corporate giants while weakening further restraints on corporate power. In the USA, strategic lawsuits against public participation had a chilling effect on civil society, with one such lawsuit resulting in a court ordering Greenpeace to pay a fossil fuel company $345 million (reduced from an initial $660 million).

In a context dominated by the US president describing climate change as a “scam”, governments did nowhere near enough to address climate displacement, equitably transition away from fossil fuels, or adequately ramp up finance for climate action – even as the UN Environment Programme warned that the world is on track to reach 3°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100.

“What alternative do the bullies and predators offer to the imperfect global experiment they’re so intent on destroying? The world order they propose is one that mocks and discards racial, gender and climate justice, treats civil society as an enemy, and rejects international solidarity. It is built on silencing dissent, weaponizing the law and dehumanizing those deemed ‘others’. Their vision of the world is predicated not on respect for our common humanity, but on military force, trade domination and technological hegemony. It is, ultimately, a vision with no moral compass,” said Agnès Callamard. 

A protester stands with both arms in the air, silhouetted against a fire burning in the background.

Fires are lit as protesters rally on 8 January 2026 in Tehran, Iran.
Aerial view of a large road reaching out into the distance filled with thousands of people.

Demonstrators gather outside Nepal’s Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu on 8 September 2025, condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government.

Protesters, civil society and international bodies lead efforts to resist, disrupt and transform

Undeterred by adversity, millions around the world are resisting injustice and authoritarian practices.

Gen Z protests swept over a dozen countries in 2025, including Indonesia, Kenya, Madagascar, Morocco, Nepal and Peru, and around 300,000 people defied Hungary’s ban on Budapest Pride to defend LGBTI rights. Throughout early 2026, demonstrators from Los Angeles to Minneapolis have organized street by street and block by block against violent and highly militarized US immigration enforcement raids.

Mass demonstrations against Israel’s genocide spread around the world last year and humanitarians from over 40 countries launched flotillas to show solidarity with Palestinians. Global activism against the flow of arms to Israel expanded, with dockworkers in France, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Spain and Sweden seeking to disrupt arms shipment routes. Activism and legal pressure also led several states to restrict or ban arms exports to Israel.

While many governments appeased attacks on international justice, several states and bodies bucked this trend by demonstrating their commitment to multilateralism and rule of law. A growing number acknowledged that Israel was committing genocide and several states joined the Hague Group, a collective committed to holding Israel accountable for violations of international law, and contributed to South Africa’s case against Israel before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The Philippines handed former president Rodrigo Duterte over to the ICC to face charges of the crime against humanity of murder, and the court issued warrants against two Taliban leaders for gender-based persecution. The Council of Europe and Ukraine agreed to establish the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, and a hybrid court in the Central African Republic convicted six former members of an armed group for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

For the sake of humanity, the time to make history is now.

Agnès Callamard

The UN Human Rights Council established an independent investigative mechanism for Afghanistan and a fact-finding mission and Commission of Inquiry on Eastern DRC, and expanded the mandate of its fact-finding mission on Iran. Significant progress was made toward a binding UN tax convention and a Crimes Against Humanity Convention, and the ICJ and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued landmark advisory opinions affirming state human rights obligations to respond to climate damage.

More states have started speaking out against authoritarian practices and attacks on the rules-based order in 2026, with the Spanish government notably taking principled stands, but such calls must be backed up with decisive and sustained action.

“From city streets to multilateral forums, 2025 brought powerful displays of resistance and solidarity from protesters, diplomats, political leaders and many others around the world. We must build on their example and courage and forge bold coalitions to reimagine, rebuild and re-centre the global order around human rights, the rule of law and universal values,” said Agnès Callamard.

“Let 2026 be the year we assert our agency and demonstrate that history is not merely something imposed upon us; it is ours to make. And for the sake of humanity, the time to make history is now.”

Amongst a crowd of people, a protester, wearing a hat and face covering, holds up a placard with GenZ and skull and cross bones.

A protester holds a placard during a demonstration against repeated water and electricity outages in Antananarivo, Madagascar, on 27 September 2025.
A row of protesters against a backdrop of palm trees. Their signs say 'Stop Alligator Alcatraz', 'No ICE in paradise' 'Stay out of my swamp'.

Demonstrators protest the construction of an immigrant detention center, dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz,” in the Florida Everglades on 28 June 2025.

Find out more about the state of the world’s human rights

The post Amnesty International calls on states to stop predatory, anti-rights order from taking hold in pivotal moment for humanity appeared first on Amnesty International.

Madagascar: Immediately end repression of Gen Z activists and protect right to protest

Reacting to an intensifying campaign of repression against Gen Z activists and civil society members by Madagascar’s military authorities, which took power following a coup in October 2025, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, Tigere Chagutah, said:

“Malagasy authorities are using deliberately vague charges of criminal conspiracy, threats to national security and destabilization of the state to silence Gen Z activists and civil society members. No one should face arbitrary arrest, detention or enforced disappearance simply for voicing their concerns about the running of their country.

Malagasy authorities are using deliberately vague charges of criminal conspiracy, threats to national security and destabilization of the state to silence Gen Z activists and civil society members.

Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa

“These authoritarian practices constitute clear violations of the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly. They are aimed at entrenching a climate of fear, while evading accountability over government policies, appointments, and the management of public resources.

They must also respect, protect and facilitate the right of assembly during protests planned for 18 April.

Tigere Chagutah

“The authorities in Madagascar must immediately end arbitrary arrests, disclose the fate and whereabouts of all those forcibly disappeared, and unconditionally release all individuals detained solely for exercising their rights. They must also respect, protect and facilitate the right of assembly during protests planned for 18 April.”

Background

Madagascar’s military authorities seized power in October 2025 following youth-led protests in 2025 demanding improved service delivery, particularly access to water and electricity, as well as more effective and inclusive governance.

The new authorities promised reforms but instead, they have deepened repression, under the pretext  of a zero-tolerance anti-corruption campaign and used broadly framed charges of criminal conspiracy, threats to national security and destabilization to target and silence Gen Z activists, civil society members and those linked to the previous regime.

The post Madagascar: Immediately end repression of Gen Z activists and protect right to protest appeared first on Amnesty International.

Burkina Faso: Dissolution of more than a hundred NGOs and associations shows intensifying crackdown on civil society

Reacting to the announcement of the dissolution of 118 NGOs and associations in Burkina Faso, Ousmane Diallo, Senior Researcher on Sahel at Amnesty International’s Regional Office for West and Central Africa, said:

“We are alarmed and deeply concerned by this flagrant attack on the right to freedom of association. Dissolving NGOs and associations is at odds with the Constitution of Burkina Faso, which guarantees freedom of association and union. The various constitutional amendments have never questioned this principle.

“This dissolution is also entirely inconsistent and incompatible with Burkina Faso’s international human rights obligations including under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which it is a state party.

This dissolution is part of a much broader effort to silence civil society through a combination of repressive tactics.

Ousmane Diallo, Senior Researcher on Sahel at Amnesty International’s Regional Office for West and Central Africa

“Civil society organizations play a critical role in the promotion and protection of human rights and the rule of law. Authorities must immediately rescind this decision and allow them to freely carry out their work without fear of reprisals.

“This dissolution is part of a much broader effort to silence civil society through a combination of repressive tactics that include abusive legislation, intimidation, harassment, arbitrary detention, and prosecution of human rights defenders and activists.

“Authorities must end their restrictions on civic space and attacks on human rights and uphold the country’s international human rights obligations and commitments.”

Background

On 15 April 2026, Burkina Faso’s Ministry of Territorial Administration and Mobility announced the dissolution of 118 NGOs and associations “in accordance with current legal provisions,” as well as a ban on their activities, without any further justifications.  

On 29 January 2026, all political parties were dissolved after three years of suspension.

In November 2025, a presidential decree required all national and international NGOs to close their accounts with commercial banks and transfer them to a newly created state-controlled bank, within the National Treasury, leading to the risk of arbitrary freezing of funds, financial surveillance, and targeted sanctions.  

Burkina Faso has been ruled by a military regime following two coups in January and September 2022. In May 2024, the military transition, which was scheduled to end on 2 July 2024, was extended by five years.

The post Burkina Faso: Dissolution of more than a hundred NGOs and associations shows intensifying crackdown on civil society appeared first on Amnesty International.

France: Decision to deny entry to veteran Palestinian human rights defender a blatant assault on human rights

The decision by French authorities to deny visa access to prominent Palestinian human rights defender and General Director of Al-Haq, Shawan Jabarin, who was due to travel to the country this week as part for an advocacy trip, is an alarming setback for human rights.

Al-Haq, the oldest Palestinian human rights organisation and a pioneer of the human rights movement in the Middle East, is one of three prominent Palestinian human rights organizations – alongside the Gaza-based Al-Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) –  facing US government sanctions for their work with the International Criminal Court (ICC). In 2021, Al-Haq was also unlawfully criminalised by Israel after decades of smear campaigns and attacks against the organisation and its staff.

“It is both shameful and deeply troubling that a human rights defender who has dedicated his life to pursuing justice for international crimes is denied entry into the Schengen area, while individuals wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity are able to travel freely. This stark and absurd double standard should prompt urgent reflection among European states on their commitment to accountability and the consistent application of international justice,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International.

“It is both shameful and deeply troubling that a human rights defender who has dedicated his life to pursuing justice for international crimes is denied entry into the Schengen area, while individuals wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity are able to travel freely.” 

Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International

“Al-Haq, Al-Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights have made an immense contribution to the global human rights movement, courageously and rigorously documenting abuses, speaking out for victims, and defending the very universal values that France claims to uphold.  In 2018, France awarded Al-Haq the prestigious French Republic Award in recognition of its human rights work, which was received by Mr. Jabarin himself. We urge the French authorities to reverse their decision immediately and commit to granting visa access to Mr Jabarin,”said Alexis Deswaef, President of International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH).

Alongside the three Palestinian organisations, the US sanctions list also includes eight ICC judges, three ICC prosecutors and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

“In 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wanted by the ICC for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Palestine, was welcomed in Hungary, and a Libyan ICC fugitive was able to enter and leave Italy, thereby entering and leaving the Schengen zone without arrest or objection from other Schengen area states. In the meantime, human rights defenders seeking to support justice are being punished and prevented from doing their legitimate human rights work,” said Alison Smith, CICC Secretariat Director.

Several countries, including France, have spoken out publicly against the sanctions, with French President Emmanuel Macron directly requesting President Trump to lift the sanctions against French ICC Judge Nicolas Guillou. They have also denounced Israel’s criminalisation of human rights organisations. France must maintain this stance and refuse to be perceived as caving to US sanctions or Israeli designations.

In October 2025, a month after the US designation against the Palestinian organisations, Shawan Jabarin’s Schengen visa application was rejected by “one or several EU member states” on the ground that he would be a “threat to public policy or internal security”. On 10 April 2026, Mr Jabarin was scheduled to travel to Europe for a series of public engagements about the sanctions and concrete steps the EU and its member states could take to support and protect the ICC and those cooperating with it. These engagements are being conducted together with the directors of PCHR and Al Mezan and several international NGOs. Given his prior Schengen visa rejection, Mr Jabarin applied for national visas from the countries he was supposed to visit: Belgium, France and the Netherlands.

At the eleventh hour, France denied his national visa, preventing him from participating in upcoming briefings with the French Parliament, civil society organisations and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Further, France’s delay in providing a response to Belgian and Dutch authorities prevented Mr Jabarin from participating in several planned engagements at the European Parliament and at the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Netherlands and Belgium did subsequently issue a national visa that enables Mr Jabarin to participate in the remaining planned engagements in the Netherlands. However, the refusal by France has already prevented Mr Jabarin from participating in some engagements and restricted his conduct of essential human rights and advocacy work, including on the impact of sanctions on the international justice ecosystem.

This denial of a visa sends an extremely alarming message from France, especially in the context of the global shrinking space for human rights work worldwide and the escalating attacks on international law itself. The refusal to issue a visa is yet another example of restrictions against human rights defenders. If linked to US sanctions or Israeli designations, it would be an extremely worrying escalation in the extra-territorial application of sanctions against those working on justice and accountability.

Signatories:

  • Amnesty International
  • Coalition for the International Criminal Court
  • International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  • No Peace Without Justice
  • Avocats Sans Frontières
  • ECCHR
  • Euromed Rights

The post France: Decision to deny entry to veteran Palestinian human rights defender a blatant assault on human rights appeared first on Amnesty International.

India: Proposed changes to digital media regulation would facilitate abusive powers over users’ content – new Amnesty legal analysis 

Proposed amendments to India’s digital regulation rules would grant authorities wide-ranging powers to police, censor and remove users’ content, Amnesty International has warned in a new legal analysis of the proposals. 

The amendments to India’s IT rules – which govern digital media content – are currently open for public consultation before they are debated in the country’s parliament. They include new powers that would enable the authorities to take down content that they deem inappropriate without a complaint; extend vague and overbroad categories to classify and prohibit content; require intermediaries’ to follow extra-legislative administrative orders to retain their legal immunity; facilitate the removal of “news and current affairs content” posted by ordinary users; and expand powers over users’ personal data. 

“The rules governing online spaces have progressively become more restrictive, with each successive amendment expanding state control over digital content,” said Aakar Patel, Amnesty International India’s Chair of Board. 

These amendments go further still, effectively turning social media platforms into enforcement arms of the state

Aakar Patel, Amnesty International India’s Chair of Board

“These amendments go further still, effectively turning social media platforms into enforcement arms of the state. They contain a raft of alarming provisions that provide the authorities with intrusive and arbitrary powers over online content, which trample over users’ freedom of expression and privacy and pave way for mass and prolonged surveillance. 

“We urge the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to immediately withdraw these amendments.” 

In its submission to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Amnesty International outlines its key concerns regarding the amendments, including: 

  • How current rules that apply only to publishers and intermediaries would be broadened to cover “news and current affairs content” posted by ordinary users, extending authorities’ powers ofcensorshiptoordinary users 
  • How the amendments would confer wide-ranging powers on authorities to order the deletion or modification of content, and to impose a range of penalties on users, without a complaint mechanism and withoutindependent orjudicial oversight.   
  • How the amendments would make the intermediaries’ legal immunity from liability for third-party content contingent on following executive orders passed by the Indian government without legislative or public scrutiny.  
  • How the amendments would allow authorities to retain users’ data for an indefinite period, without clear limitations, independent oversight, and strict necessity requirements. 

In recent months, there have been several high-profile cases of online censorship in India. They include stand-up comedian Pulkit Mani, who had a satirical video in which he mimicked Prime Minister Narendra Modi blocked from Instagram in March. 

On 18 March, MeitY ordered X, the social media platform, to block 12 accounts under Section 69A of the IT Act, which X did despite subsequently raising concerns that most of the content on those accounts did not appear to break the law. 

The post India: Proposed changes to digital media regulation would facilitate abusive powers over users’ content – new Amnesty legal analysis  appeared first on Amnesty International.