UK/Global: Human rights and health groups in new briefing urge hospitals not to use Palantir software and demand that NHS England cancels the contract entirely

Responding to the launch of Medact’s (an organisation bringing together health workers in the UK) latest briefing that outlines grave human rights concerns and risks posed by contracting Palantir to build NHS England’s Federated Data Platform (FDP), Matt Mahmoudi, Researcher and Advisor on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights at Amnesty International said:

“Amnesty International supports the briefing published by Medact and partners exposing why Palantir’s is an unsuitable partner for National Health Services (NHS) England due to significant human rights concerns associated with the company. Palantir has a track record of flagrantly disregarding international law and standards, both in the  violations of the human rights of migrants in the United States, to which it risks contributing to, and its ongoing supply of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services to the Israeli military and intelligence services that are linked to Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

“Amnesty International is calling on NHS England, the UK government and all other public institutions to use their leverage from their investments, including by responsibly divesting from Palantir and ceasing the purchase of equipment and services from the company. These measures must remain in place until the company can demonstrate that it is not contributing to Israel’s genocide, apartheid, unlawful occupation or other crimes under international law.”

Background

The briefing by Medact recommends NHS trusts and Integrated Care Boards (ICB) in England refuse to adopt Palantir’s Federated Data Platform (FDP).

Medact wrote to Palantir ahead of the publication of the briefing, and the company’s responses are reflected in their briefing. Palantir’s responses to Amnesty International’s allegations in relation to the use of its technology in Gaza and the United States are included in the respective outputs.

Palantir’s software is not fully operational within the NHS. Trusts and ICBs can and should decline to use the software, and NHS England must terminate its contract with Palantir at its upcoming review in February 2027.

On March 16, an online webinar will outline the briefing’s key findings and explore what they mean for the growing and urgent campaign to remove Palantir from the NHS.

Amnesty International is calling on Palantir to immediately cease its operations with all aspects of the Israeli military.

The post UK/Global: Human rights and health groups in new briefing urge hospitals not to use Palantir software and demand that NHS England cancels the contract entirely appeared first on Amnesty International.

Middle East: All parties to the conflict must refrain from unlawful attacks on energy infrastructure

Israel, the US and the Islamic Republic of Iran must immediately cease or refrain from unlawful attacks on energy infrastructure, including facilities providing essential services such as electricity, heating and running water, said Amnesty International today, highlighting the risks of devastating civilian harm and environmental impact posed by such attacks.

In recent days Israeli-US air strikes have targeted multiple fuel storage and distribution facilities in Iran, and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s military has carried out attacks affecting fuel depots and oil and gas infrastructure in multiple Gulf states.

“The potential for vast, predictable, and devastating civilian harm arising from strikes targeting energy infrastructure, including uncontrolled deadly fires, major disruptions to essential services, environmental damage, and severe long-term health risks for millions, means there is a substantial risk such attacks would violate international humanitarian law and in some cases could amount to war crimes,” said Heba Morayef, Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

“Regardless of whether a military objective is cited to justify targeting energy infrastructure, under international humanitarian law all parties have a clear obligation to take all feasible precautions to reduce civilian harm and refrain from attacks that cause disproportionate death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects. This includes any foreseeable knock-on, indirect adverse effects on civilians’ life and health such as exposure to toxic chemicals.”

The potential for vast, predictable, and devastating civilian harm arising from strikes targeting energy infrastructure…means there is a substantial risk such attacks would violate international humanitarian law 

Heba Morayef, MENA Regional Director

Under international humanitarian law, an oil refinery can be targeted only if it qualifies as a military objective, meaning it is being used to make an effective contribution to military action – for example by producing fuel for the attacking armed forces – and damaging it would yield a definite military advantage in the circumstances ruling at the time. Even if those two prerequisites exist, the attacking party must take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize collateral damage to civilians, such as the release of toxic substances, and, before striking, consider whether any such damage would be excessive to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.  

Attacks on oil depots in Iran

In Iran, horrifying video footage of the aftermath of Israeli-US attacks on several fuel depots, including in the neighborhoods of Shahran, Sohanak and Kouhak in Tehran and the city of Shahr-e Rey in Tehran province and Fardis in Alborz province, on 7 March shows massive flames and plumes of thick black smoke rising, as well as large uncontrolled fires damaging civilian areas. Eyewitnesses also described to Amnesty International chilling scenes of oil-tainted rainfall.

After the attacks Iran’s environmental agency and the Iranian Red Crescent Society advised people in Tehran to stay indoors warning of the risks posed by the spread of toxic chemicals that could cause acid rain as a result of the air strikes.

The Israeli military has issued a statement confirming they carried out attacks on “a number of fuel storage facilities in Tehran”, saying they were used by the Islamic Republic of Iran’s military “to operate military infrastructure”.

“We are deeply alarmed at the potential impact of these attacks on the civilian population. Medical warnings about hazardous materials and toxic substances being released into the air, put millions of people in Tehran at risk of serious health complications, including cancer, lung and respiratory diseases and skin burns. States are bound to uphold social and economic rights during both peacetime and armed conflict,” said Heba Morayef.

An informed source in Tehran told Amnesty International that residential buildings around the oil depots in Shahran were damaged, leaving some people homeless.

An eyewitness told Amnesty International “The sky over Tehran was black today [8 March]. Then black rain started to fall. The ground everywhere has turned black, as if a layer of light cement had been poured over.”

Another eyewitness said on 8 March “This morning, the air was pitch black. It is daytime, but it’s dark like night. The city is full of soot. I went outside. It was raining a little, and my hands became black immediately. Soot is falling from the sky. It is terrifying.”

On 8 March, the Political Deputy Provincial Governor of Alborz province, Ghodratollah Seif, announced that the strike on the oil depot in Fardis killed at least six people and injured 21 others, including nearby residents. On 9 March, the president of Alborz University of Medical Sciences said that a dialysis center near the oil depot in Fardis was destroyed in the ensuing fire.

Attacks on energy infrastructure in Iran risk compounding the suffering of a population traumatized by massacres at the hands of the Islamic Republic authorities and who have already endured years of declining access to electricity, water, clean air, and a safe environment due to chronic state mismanagement and systemic violation of the people’s human right to take part in public affairs. These grievances, along with severe political repression, have been at the heart of successive nationwide protests, including most recently in January 2026, demanding human rights, dignity, and downfall of the Islamic Republic system. 

Attacks on oil infrastructure in Gulf countries

Since 28 February, multiple attacks affecting energy infrastructure have been reported in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. The Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has said that its forces are “attacking American bases, American installations, American assets” that were  “unfortunately” based in their Gulf neighbouring countries, while the head of parliament, Mohammad Bagher Balifar, proclaimed that “as long as US bases exist in the region, countries will not see calm”.

Officials from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain and Kuwait have said that Iranian drones and missiles have directly targeted oil and gas facilities in Gulf states, and that in other cases debris from intercepted attacks affected facilities. Governments across the Gulf severely restrict access to information and expression, which impedes reporting on the direct effects of attacks.

In Qatar, on 2 March, Qatari Ministry of Defence stated that Iranian drones had targeted energy facilities in the Ras Laffan Industrial City, Qatar’s main liquefied natural gas (LNG) export hub, but no casualties were reported. Following the attack, Qatar Energy suspended LNG production and declared force majeure, according to Reuters and Bloomberg News citing informed sources .   

On 7 March, the Saudi Ministry of Defence announced that 21 drones headed toward Aramco’s  Shaybah field, one the Kingdom’s largest oil fields, and includes facilities that produce natural gas liquids used in the petrochemical industry,  in several waves were intercepted and destroyed in the Empty Quarter.

In Kuwait, on 7 March, a spokesperson for the Kuwait Ministry of Defence said that drones targeted fuel tanks at Kuwait International Airport.

In Oman, on 1 March, state media reported that two drones struck the commercial port in Duqm on the eastern coast, injuring one foreign worker. On 2 March, state media stated that a drone strike targeted an oil tanker off the coast of Muscat, killing one Indian crew member.

Fires have broken out at a number of facilities, which officials speaking to the media have attributed either to missile attacks or debris from drone interceptions. In some cases, state-owned fossil fuel companies have reported suspending production or shipments after attacks.

In Bahrain, on 5 March, a fire broke out in one of the refinery units of the state-owned Bapco Energies as a result of an Iranian missile attack, according to Bahrain News Agency.  The company declared force majeure on its oil shipments.

In Saudi Arabia, on 2 March, the Saudi Ministry of Defense stated that two drones attempting to target the Saudi Aramco Ras Tanura oil refinery in the Eastern Province were intercepted, and the falling debris ignited a fire inside the facility.

In the UAE, on 10 March a fire broke out at Ruwais Industrial Complex in Abu Dhabi following a drone attack, according to Reuters. Fires also broke out at Musaffah fuel tank terminal on 2 March after it was targeted by a drone and at an oil industry zone in Fujairah on 3 March, after debris from a drone interception caused a fire. 

On 9 March, the official Kuwait News Agency reported that drone debris caused a fire in a fuel tank at Al Subiya power plant.

In addition to attacks on the Gulf states, commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has come to an almost complete halt. On 10 March, the High Commissioner for Human Rights warned that the plunge in commercial shipping was already having a severe impact on access to “energy, food and fertilizer for people in the region and beyond,” and that an oil price surge would have economic and social knock-on effects. He once again called for investment in renewable energy.

“Attacks on or severely affecting fuel supply and distribution networks can trigger food insecurity, as these systems currently play a critical role in transportation, the goods supply chain, and industrial activity. All parties must ensure they are refraining from any unlawful attacks and place the protection of civilians at the forefront of all military decisions,” said Heba Morayef.

Background

According to Iranian officials, at least 1,255 people have been killed in Iran since 28 February when US-Israeli attacks began. At least 17 people have been killed in the Gulf since Iran began its attacks on Gulf countries (two in Bahrain; six in Kuwait; one person in Oman; two in Saudi Arabia; and six in the UAE). Eleven out of the 17 people are foreign nationals from India, Iran, Indonesia and Bangladesh amongst other countries residing in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain according to official state media reports. A least 570 people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Lebanon according to the authorities. At least 12 people have been killed by attacks in Israel according to media reports.

The post Middle East: All parties to the conflict must refrain from unlawful attacks on energy infrastructure appeared first on Amnesty International.

Wesam Hamada: “I want to keep Hind’s voice alive, because hers is the voice of all the children of Gaza”

On 29 January 2024, five-year-old Hind Rajab was brutally killed, along with her four cousins, uncle and aunt, by the Israeli military as they attempted to flee a neighbourhood in Gaza City. The two Palestinian Red Crescent paramedics who went to Hind’s rescue were also killed by the Israeli military.    

Hind’s mother, Wesam Hamada, was talking to her on the phone as the little girl, with Israeli soldiers nearby, hid out of sight and pleaded to be rescued. The recording of Hinds emergency call with the Palestinian Red Crescent volunteers was used as the basis of the Oscar-nominated film, “Hind Rajab’s Voice”.

At an international conference organized by The European Palestinian Network in Copenhagen, Denmark, Wesam Hamada tells Amnesty International about her daughter’s last words, why she feels compelled to keep Hind’s memory alive and her wishes for Gaza’s children.

What were some of Hind’s last words to you, and do you hold the world responsible for her terrible death?

I’m scared… come and get me.

She said a sentence that tore my heart apart: ‘Mum, they’re lying. Stay with me!’ At that moment, I realized the betrayal. An ambulance was sent to her. It didn’t make it. It was bombed. That means one thing: it wasn’t allowed to save a life.

I don’t blame the world’s population, but I hold the silence responsible. The silence that makes the crime possible and makes it easy to repeat it.

Hind’s story is unimaginably heart-breaking and devastating. Where do you find the strength to keep going?

I get my strength from Hind. She was so strong when she was trapped in the car for hours. She kept talking on the phone even though she was injured, freezing and hungry. She kept talking to stay alive. She tried to calm me down even though she knew she was surrounded by Israeli soldiers, there was gunfire, and she was in a very dangerous situation. She is much stronger than me.

What would you like the world to know about your daughter, Hind?

Hind was a very strong and smart girl. She wanted to be a doctor so she could heal children. Not only in Gaza, but all over the world. If Hind were alive today and she saw all the terrible things that are happening to the children of Gaza, she wouldn’t be able to handle it.

Even though a ceasefire was announced late last year, the suffering in Gaza continues. What are Palestinians in Gaza experiencing right now?

The first proof that the genocide continues every day is the many people who are being killed. My family and friends tell me that they can’t get what they need. There is no access to water, there is no electricity, food or medicine. The health system has collapsed and there is no access to education for children.

The genocide has not stopped, and normal life has not returned to Gaza.

Every woman, every child, every person in Gaza is still a target.

A mother, sits on dappled peach steps with her young daughter and son. They smile at the camera.

L-R Hind Rajab, Iyad and Wesam Hamada

Why is it important for you to attend public events to speak about Hind and what she went through?

As the mother of Hind and Iyad, I have a big responsibility. I want to keep Hind’s voice alive, because it is not only her voice but the voice of all the children of Gaza.

It brings hope to the children of Gaza when they see that people are behind them. Not just with supportive slogans, but with real change. When emergency aid reaches them in Gaza and when hospitals and schools reopen.

Your daughter’s story is told in the Oscar-nominated film, The Voice of Hind Rajab. What does it mean to you that Hind is remembered in this way?

The film represents not only Hind’s story, but the stories of thousands of children in Gaza. More than 20,000 children have been killed in Gaza. The film documents this crime. And this documentation will be there for generations to come.

How has the strength and resilience of children in Gaza revealed themselves to you?

We were hiding in a basement with 75 other family members. The Israeli military was very close. The children were very hungry. They hadn’t eaten anything for nine hours. To keep the children quiet and make sure they would not be found by the soldiers, I promised that I would cook them a really good meal if we survived. At night, the Israeli military withdrew. But I couldn’t keep my promise because we had no more food. I apologized to the children many times. They simply replied that it was okay and that they would be fine.

What do you wish for the children of Gaza?

I am not asking for the impossible. I am asking for something very simple: that the life of a Palestinian child will be protected as if it was the life of your own child.

If the law cannot save a child, then it is a law that must be held accountable. And if the world only acts when the victim looks like its own children, then the world needs a new conscience.

Hind is no longer here, but her story is a responsibility. And a responsibility is not maintained with words, but with actions.

I ask you to imagine, just for a few seconds, the extent of the pain that mothers in Gaza bear when they lose their children. Imagine the bitterness of the pain, when you can’t save your child, or simply reach them, or know what their last moments were like. This pain lives in mothers every single day and with every breath they take.

End Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza

The post Wesam Hamada: “I want to keep Hind’s voice alive, because hers is the voice of all the children of Gaza” appeared first on Amnesty International.

Côte d’Ivoire: Pregnant women among those detained without cause since October 2025 crackdown

Five months on from opposition protests banned by the authorities that saw hundreds of people arrested, including pregnant women, some are still being held even though they had no involvement in the protests, while others have been convicted in unfair trials, Amnesty International said today.

In October 2025, a few days before the presidential election, hundreds of people, including protesters and passersby, were arrested during the crackdown on protests. Several of them have been convicted in unfair trials in which they were denied a lawyer. Dozens of others, including a pregnant woman, remain in pretrial detention, according to lawyers. 

“Today, five months after their arrest, people are still being held solely because they happened to be in the vicinity of the protests. The Ivorian authorities must order their release,” said Marceau Sivieude, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for West and Central Africa.

“According to our information, several of the prisoners detained since October 2025 have not been allowed to see family members or lawyers, and are not receiving adequate medical care. We are very concerned about the situation of three women who, despite being in the advanced stages of pregnancy, are being held at the Abidjan prison complex.”

These women were caught up in raids while going about their daily business.

Lawyer Sylvain Tapi

Pregnant and held without cause for five months

Two of the pregnant women were convicted a few days after their arrest in October 2025 for ‘disturbing public order’, ‘participating in an unauthorized demonstration’, and ‘gathering on public roads’.

One of the women, a street seller and mother of four who is currently in the late stages of pregnancy, was arrested on 11 October while selling fruit juice near the site of a protest. She was sentenced on 16 October to three years in prison. Her family has been denied visitation rights. The second, a mother of five currently six months pregnant, was arrested on 11 October while in possession of a t-shirt bearing the colors of an opposition party, and sentenced on 22 October to the same punishment.

“These women were caught up in raids while going about their daily business. They are in an environment that is not conducive to a healthy pregnancy. They are severely affected both mentally and physically,” said their lawyer Sylvain Tapi. 

Both women have appealed their sentences and are awaiting the date of their appeal hearing.

A third woman, who is currently seven months pregnant, is being held in pretrial detention. She went out on 20 October to buy cookies and witnessed protesters fleeing from members of security forces. She took refuge in her home, where she was beaten and taken away by policemen, according to her relatives.

The Ivorian authorities must respect the Nelson Mandela Rules for the treatment of prisoners.

Marceau Sivieude, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for West and Central Africa

Right to a fair trial must be guaranteed

Amnesty International has documented the cases of two men arrested near the protests who were tried and sentenced to three years in prison a few days after their arrest without legal representation. Both men were arrested on their way to work.  One of them was searched and found to be carrying a membership card for an opposition party, according to his relatives who visit him in prison.

“In cases where offences have not been formally established, charges against prisoners must be dropped and they must be released immediately. Trials in the first instance and on appeal must be held as quickly as possible and with due regard for the rights of the defence. The Ivorian authorities also have the duty to ensure appropriate medical care for those detained, including prenatal care and facilitate family visits,” said Marceau Sivieude.

“The use of blanket bans on protests in October 2025 was a stark failure of the Ivorian authorities to uphold the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly, as stated by Amnesty International. We urge the Ivorian authorities to release all prisoners detained only for participating in peaceful protests.”

“Authorities must guarantee and ensure the human rights of everyone including the rights to liberty, freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, and uphold the country’s international human rights obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. They must also respect the Nelson Mandela Rules for the treatment of prisoners.”

Background

On 2 October 2025, a few weeks before the presidential election, the National Security Council banned gatherings and deployed 44,000 members of the security forces across the country. On the same day, the prefect of Abidjan, the economic capital of Côte d’Ivoire, banned a peaceful gathering planned for 4 October by opposition parties to denounce the exclusion of two candidates from the presidential election.

On 11 October, groups of young people attempting to gather peacefully were dispersed with tear gas. Authorities reported 237 arrests in Abidjan and 18 in Dabou, about 50km from Abidjan, on that day.

On 12 October, two opposition parties called for daily demonstrations. On 16 October, the public prosecutor reported  the arrest of approximately 700 people. On the same day, around 50 people were sentenced to three years in prison for disturbing public order, among other charges.

Following the presidential election on 25 October, Alassane Ouattara was declared the winner in the first round.

The post Côte d’Ivoire: Pregnant women among those detained without cause since October 2025 crackdown appeared first on Amnesty International.

Three abortion rights defenders share their stories of hope

Across the world, governments and other actors are rolling back on decades of progress on gender equality, including access to abortion. But people are fighting back, determined to protect the rights so many have fought so hard to achieve.    

As the Commission on the Status of Women holds its 70th session, three courageous human rights defenders from Burkina Faso, Poland and the United States share their strategies to protect access to abortion, their hopes for the future and the reasons why they believe that, despite the many increasing challenges, humanity must always win. 

Cécile Yougbare, activist in Côte d’Ivoire: “I refuse to let women die from clandestine abortions when solutions exist”   

Cécile Yougbare, a Black woman with braided hair wearing a white top blazer, looks to the side as she smiles. She is an activist in Côte d'Ivoire

I am a human rights defender. I specialize in challenges related to women’s health because several factors, such as unsafe abortions, continue to cause preventable deaths among girls and women. 

For 20 years, both through my community and professional commitments, my fight has focused on women’s rights and sexual and reproductive health rights, including access to safe abortions, working for the organisationMédecins du Monde.  

Abortion rights advocates face many challenges, including psychological and physical violence.  Abortion still is a taboo subject that carries a lot of stigma. Even where the law allows it in countries such as Benin, social and religious stigma persists.

I come from a very religious, Catholic family. In my family, we were taught about the Church and prayer, and many of my relatives who are priests and nuns expect us to embody the virtue of people who do not encourage abortion. When you go against these “family values” and beliefs, you can be subjected to personal attacks and psychological violence. However, my faith does not prevent me from working for social justice and saving lives by reducing preventable deaths due to unsafe abortions.   

Challenges  

Legal frameworks are restrictive and sometimes contradictory, which often leads to delays or a total lack of care.   

The rollback on funding is also a great challenge. Most funds for humanitarian organizations today explicitly exclude abortion or impose restrictions while anti-rights movements receive increasing support. The fear of losing funds and insecurity overall is forcing many activists to self-censor.   

Advocacy is one of our main strategies, complemented by evidence gathering. We collect evidence on maternal deaths to show the authorities that people are dying from preventable causes.   

At the community level, we work to simplify legal language to transform a taboo subject into one of public health and human dignity.  

Inspiration   

My commitment is fuelled by the stories of women who have survived clandestine abortions and by the gaze of young women who realise that they finally have the right to decide for themselves.   

My motivation is simple: I refuse to let young women die from clandestine abortions when solutions exist. I am very proud to be an advocate, because defending sexual and reproductive rights means defending human dignity, freedom of choice and equality.   

Kinga Jelińska, activist from Poland: “We are creating a different way to approach health care, based on trust and dignity”   

Kinga Jelińska, activist from Poland looks at the camera as she is holding a blister pack of medication. She has blond hair and is wearing a black jacket and a green scarf.

©Amnesty International.

I live in Amsterdam, Netherlands, although I am originally from Poland.  

In Poland, abortion was something hidden. In the Netherlands, it is available until 22 weeks of gestation. This made me realise that things could be done differently and motivated me to work for abortion to be accessible to all. I have always been a human rights activist, and women’s rights is something very close to my heart and soul.   

A faulty paradigm   

There is something fascinating about working on abortion because trying to regulate it doesn’t make sense. The whole paradigm seeks to exclude someone.   

Limiting access to abortion has to do with politics, stigma, patriarchy and misogyny. When safe abortions are denied, people resort to unsafe methods, which are often deadly.  

Reclaiming power   

I work with the international feminist activist organisation Women Help Women.   

We focus on self-managed abortion because it is a practical game changer, but also a political project of autonomy to fight against patriarchy and medicalisation.  

We run a global online support service and send the medicines (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) to those who request them from us all over the world. In my country, Poland, we are the largest provider of abortion care. In 2024, the government reported 128 abortions were carried out. In contrast, we hear from 130 people a day. We are creating a different way to approach health care, based on trust and dignity.   

Politics of care   

We are human rights defenders. If someone says to you, “I need help,” it would be absolutely inhumane to say, “I’m not going to help you.”   

A colleague in Poland, Justyna Wydrzyńska, had a criminal court case for assisting with an abortion that did not even take place. This exposes the crisis in the system because it criminalises empathy. In Poland, there is constant harassment of abortion rights defenders and no political will to protect us. It’s about harassing us to the point of exhaustion.   

Organizations like Amnesty International act as both watchdog and amplifier — they expose human rights violations and make sure the world cannot ignore them. Access to safe abortion, including self-managed abortion, is not a grey zone or a political debate; it is a clear human rights issue rooted in bodily autonomy, health, and dignity. Amnesty helps ensure that this reality is named, documented, and defended at a global level. 

The belief that we can imagine and do things better motivates me. My recipe for sustainable activism is having positive imagination mixed with a little bit of anger.  

We have the tools and knowledge to provide good care. If we walk together towards the feminist practice of self-managed abortion, we can make a difference. I am very proud to be a human rights defender and abortion provider. It is about autonomy, care, support and solidarity.   

Erin Grant,Abortion Care Networkco-Executive Director: “Our primary strategy is to build community”  

Erin Grant, a Black woman with braided hair and glasses, is looking at the camera smiling as she is sitting with her hands on her lap. She is the co-Executive Director of Abortion Care Network.

I’m the co-executive director, alongside Nikki Madsen, of the Abortion Care Network. We are the only membership organisation for independent abortion providers in the United States. ACN is an organisation, and the independent abortion providers are the human rights defenders as they deliver the majority of publicly available abortion care in the country, along with their allies.  

A devastating situation   

Since the fall of Roevs Wade (the ruling that guaranteed the right to abortion in the United States), the situation is devastating: 100 abortion clinics have closed, and only 14% of US counties have an abortion provider.   

The ruling created a state where abortion is essentially banned for a large number of people, especially those who are already marginalised: racialised people, low-income people, people with disabilities, and those living in rural areas. The system in the US has always been designed to serve the wealthy white elite, and the rest of us have been left behind. 

The bans and constant harassment are working as they were intended: making abortion access more difficult, risky, expensive, inequitable, and now in some cases criminalized. 

People are now forced to travel extreme distances, often thousands of miles, which takes time, money, and resources.  

There is also a growing concern about digital surveillance and the legal risks involved in traveling out of state to receive care. This adds a layer of fear and insecurity.   

Independent clinics are our ‘front line.’ They are the constant target of attacks, protests, and harassment.  

Abortion is not a legal or illegal issue; abortion exists, with or without clinics.   

Building community   

Our primary strategy at ACN is to counteract the isolation imposed by anti-rights actors by building community. We share resources, best practices, and provide emotional support.  

Our tagline is “Stronger Together,” and ACN believes that abortion providers need spaces that are designed to keep them in community with each other, normalize the care they provide, and further opportunities for the clinics, workers, and the people they serve.  

A vital issue   

The anti-abortion movement uses a very strong playbook of tactics to strip away the rights of people who are seen as “other.” In the US, there is a strong white supremacist movement that promotes the idea that if you are not blonde, blue-eyed, thin, able-bodied, and if you do not reproduce, you are not worthy of decent community care. I do not believe that.  

Everyone deserves the opportunity to make their own decisions and to trust their own body. Reproductive health access and the right to bodily autonomy, like abortion, should be a vital issue, just like access to water, food, or decent housing.   

Amnesty International is an important ally in connecting abortion care as a form of human rights work. Abortion Care Network has ally members who don’t provide abortion care, and they are crucial to the reproductive health, rights, and justice landscape, like lawyers, artists, researchers, and advocates. They also ensure that independent abortion providers feel seen and supported. Allies are critical. Amnesty International has a pivotal role to play in declaring abortion care and reproductive autonomy as a cornerstone of human rights and connecting the global story of the right to health. Amnesty International’s immeasurable reach ensures that everyone knows abortion providers are brave, resilient people, doing vital, generational work. 

The post Three abortion rights defenders share their stories of hope appeared first on Amnesty International.