The Pegasus Project: One year on, spyware crisis continues after failure to clamp down on surveillance industry

One year after the Pegasus Project revelations, the lack of a global moratorium on the sale of spyware is allowing the surveillance industry to continue unchecked, Amnesty International warned today.

The Pegasus Project uncovered how governments worldwide were using NSO Group’s invasive Pegasus spyware to put human rights activists, political leaders, journalists and lawyers around the world under unlawful surveillance.

Following repeated calls for the surveillance industry to be regulated, some steps have been taken in the right direction – but government action has not yet been enough.

Everyone targeted with NSO Group’s spyware has a right to remedy

Danna Ingleton, Amnesty Tech’s Deputy Director

“One year after the Pegasus spyware revelations shocked the world, it is alarming that surveillance companies are still profiting from human rights violations on a global scale,” said Danna Ingleton, Amnesty Tech’s Deputy Director.

“The Pegasus Project offered a wake-up call that action was urgently needed to regulate an industry that is out of control. Shamefully, governments worldwide are yet to step up and fully deal with this digital surveillance crisis.

“Everyone targeted with NSO Group’s spyware has a right to remedy. Global governments’ failure to take meaningful action is an insult to all those who have suffered, physically and psychologically, after being targeted with this invasive software.

“The unlawful targeted surveillance of human rights defenders and civil society is a tool of repression. It is time to clamp down on this industry that continues to operate in the shadows.”

The Pegasus Project was a collaboration by journalists from 17 media organizations in 10 countries, coordinated by Forbidden Stories. Amnesty International’s Security Lab used cutting-edge digital forensic tests and research methodologies to confirm evidence of targeting and infections on scores of phones around the world.

In the last year, the Security Lab uncovered new instances of targeting using Pegasus in Morocco-Western Sahara and Poland. In addition, the Security Lab independently confirmed numerous additional cases where Pegasus was still being used to unlawfully target people, including cases in El Salvador, Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territories, Poland, and Spain.

Unlawful surveillance violates the right to privacy, and can also violate the rights to freedom of expression, opinion, association, and peaceful assembly.

‘A very violent form of censorship’

Amnesty International has been investigating unlawful surveillance for many years. There is mounting evidence of human rights violations being committed by governments, and how companies profit from unlawful targeted surveillance.

Every month, there are new cases confirmed of people being targeted with Pegasus. Amnesty International interviewed several people who had been infected with Pegasus, who told of their distress at being targeted.

That’s their goal: to make you paranoid, isolate you from people and lock you in a prison

Hicham Mansouri, Moroccan journalist

Julia Gavarrete, a journalist in El Salvador, said: “It’s a shame that a powerful tool to combat criminals is being used to attack independent journalists and human rights defenders. It’s a shame that we have no clue about who was behind the targeting. It’s impossible not to feel angry when our entire life is at someone else’s hands, and there’s no answers about the responsibility of this. 

“Being targeted led me to change my way of communicating, the places I used to go, and also to think twice about the type of information I want to share with others – not only because of my own security, but to protect the integrity of those who communicate with me. I have to be aware of the places we visit and try to be very careful every time we have our devices near…  As a journalist, I have to guard my sources, but as a woman, I need to protect my family and friends. Surveillance entails an indignity to our professional life and our private life.” 

Hicham Mansouri, a Moroccan journalist living in France, described being targeted as “a very violent form of censorship, because we deprive ourselves of expressing ourselves on many subjects both in a professional and personal context”. He added: “That’s their goal: to make you paranoid, isolate you from people and lock you in a prison.”

Ongoing investigations

There are currently open investigations and cases pending against NSO Group in France, India, Mexico, Poland and Spain. In March, the European Parliament established the PEGA Committee to investigate the use of Pegasus and other spyware in Europe.

In November 2021, the United States’ government placed NSO Group on its Entity List, for “engaging in activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests”. Later that month, Apple filed a lawsuit against NSO Group to hold it accountable for the surveillance and targeting of Apple users.

In recent weeks, there have been reports that US defence contractor company L3Harris is in talks to buy ownership of Pegasus software. NSO Group’s future remains uncertain.

“Any attempt by NSO Group to alter its business model in a bid to evade accountability must be resisted. The entire surveillance industry is broken and needs urgent reform,” said Danna Ingleton.

“We continue to call for a global moratorium on the sale, transfer and use of spyware until human rights regulatory safeguards that govern its use are in place.”

States have binding obligations under international law to not only respect human rights, but also to protect them from abuse by third parties, including private companies.

The post The Pegasus Project: One year on, spyware crisis continues after failure to clamp down on surveillance industry appeared first on Amnesty International.

Russia: Opposition activist sentenced to four years in prison under repressive ‘undesirable organization’ law

Reacting to news that a Russian court has sentenced opposition activist and human rights defender, Andrei Pivovarov, to four years in a penal colony, on charges brought under the country’s repressive ‘undesirable organizations’ legislation, Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, said:

“Andrei Pivovarov’s unjust prosecution and cruel prison sentence are part of a campaign by Russian authorities to weaponize the Criminal Code against anyone who dares to exercise their right to freedom of expression. Both the verdict today and the criminal article under which it was issued are shameful.”

Andrei Pivovarov’s unjust prosecution and cruel prison sentence are part of a campaign by Russian authorities to weaponize the Criminal Code against anyone who dares to exercise their right to freedom of expression

Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia

“Andrei Pivovarov should be immediately and unconditionally released. The authorities must also urgently repeal the legislation on ’undesirable organizations’ and ensure people can exercise their right to association without fear of reprisals. This law is clearly not concerned with criminal activity, but with repressing any form of dissent or criticism of the government. It simply should not exist.”

Andrei Pivovarov said in his final statement in court on 11 July: “And even if now those who stand for the future are trampled and imprisoned, I know that progress cannot be stopped, changes for the better are inevitable, and they are not far off. See you in our new, desirable and open Russia. We will pull through!”

Background

On 15 July, the Leninsky District Court of Krasnodar, southern Russia, sentenced Andrei Pivovarov, the former head of the now-disbanded Otkrytaya Rossiya (Open Russia) movement founded by Kremlin critic Mikhail Khodorkovsky, to four years in a penal colony. Andrei Pivovarov was found guilty of leading an “undesirable organization”, a law that clearly contravenes the right to association. The charges relate to at least 30 social media posts he had shared about the group’s activities which he had led.

The crackdown came after the Russian authorities banned a UK-based organization called Open Russia in April 2017, which led to widespread reprisals against the Russian group of the same name. Pivovarov’s Otkrytaya Rossiya movement had ceased all work several days before his arrest on 31 May 2021, when he was taken off a flight from Saint Petersburg to Warsaw and put in pre-trial detention.

The post Russia: Opposition activist sentenced to four years in prison under repressive ‘undesirable organization’ law appeared first on Amnesty International.

Russia: Feminist activist acquitted of absurd ‘pornography’ charges

Responding to the acquittal of feminist activist and artist Yulia Tsvetkova, who was charged with “disseminating pornography” for creating body-positive illustrations of female sexual organs, a crime punishable by up to three years in prison, Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, said:

“The acquittal of Yulia Tsvetkova today marks a rare and welcome triumph of sanity and justice over remorseless repression. In a country where state-sponsored homophobia and misogyny are the norm, Tsvetkova’s trial was a landmark case. Her acquittal must now set a new precedent that ensures the right to freedom of expression is upheld and protected for all.

“For more than three years, Yulia Tsvetkova has suffered unrelenting mistreatment by the authorities in the form of criminal proceedings, fines, threats, arrests and travel restrictions, all of which were imposed solely in response to her peaceful activism.

For more than three years, Yulia Tsvetkova has suffered unrelenting mistreatment by the authorities in the form of criminal proceedings, fines, threats, arrests and travel restrictions

Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Director for Eastern Europe and Central Asia

“The Russian authorities must immediately stop targeting feminists and LGBTI activists. Instead, they should honour their international human rights obligations by enabling a safe and supportive environment in which human rights defenders can work without fear of reprisals.”

Background

On 15 July, the Central District Court of Komsomolsk-on-Amur in Russia’s Far East acquitted Tsvetkova and cleared her of all charges. She had been accused of creating and sharing “pornographic” images — including body-positive drawings of women’s bodies that depict the vagina as a beautiful, flower-like symbol — on VKontakte, a Russian social media site.

She was detained on 20 November 2019 and held under house arrest until 16 March 2020. In December 2019, she was found guilty of sharing “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations with minors” and fined 50,000 roubles (US$780). In July 2020, she was fined a further 75,000 roubles (US$1,050).

On 3 June 2022, the Ministry of Justice placed Tsvetkova on its “foreign agents” register, which is used to restrict independent NGOs, media organizations and activists.

The post Russia: Feminist activist acquitted of absurd ‘pornography’ charges appeared first on Amnesty International.

Sri Lanka: Authorities must refrain from use of military to police protests

The Sri Lankan authorities must not impose a blanket order authorising use of force during the state of emergency that has been announced and refrain from use of the armed forces to police people’s protest said Amnesty International today following a new order empowering armed forces to maintain law and order in Colombo.

“The recent escalation of the authorities’ response to protests by calling in the armed forces, firing at protestors and excessive use of tear gas which resulted in the death of one person yesterday is deeply worrying,” said Yamini Mishra, Amnesty International’s South Asia Regional Director.

The recent escalation of the authorities’ response to protests by calling in the armed forces, firing at protestors and excessive use of tear gas which resulted in the death of one person yesterday is deeply worrying.

Yamini Mishra, Amnesty International’s South Asia Regional Director

On the morning of 13 July 2022, thousands of protestors started making their way towards the Prime Minister’s office and the Parliament in Colombo. After an angry face-off, protesters breached the gates and took over the Prime Minister’s office. Amnesty International staff present at the protest location confirmed that law enforcement officers fired volleys of teargas against people, including children and journalists some of whom were seen escaping the plumes while coughing and sputtering. Dozens of protesters were injured, and one was reported dead. At Galle Face, helicopters flew low overhead, where a rolling peaceful protest site had been established three months ago in the prolonged agitation over the economic crisis in the country. At another protest near the Parliament later the same day, more than 80 people were reported to be injured and admitted to hospital.

At 3pm the Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe delivered a televised address in which he said he had ordered the military to “do whatever is necessary to restore order”. On 14 July 2022, a press release was issued by the army announcing a warning that they will use force to restore law and order in the country.

Any blanket order authorising use of force by armed forces is problematic even during times of emergency. The armed forces should not be involved in the policing of public assemblies, since they are trained to fight against enemies and not to protect and control civilians.

The armed forces should not be involved in the policing of public assemblies, since they are trained to fight against enemies and not to protect and control civilians.

Yamini Mishra

Amnesty calls upon law enforcement agencies to act with restraint to avoid further serious injury and loss of life. They may only use the minimum level of force necessary force to bring a situation under control where doing so is strictly necessary and proportionate. Even in instances where some parts of a protests turn violent, law enforcement must assess the situation on a case-by-case basis with use of force only where absolutely necessary and only against those engaged in violence. It must be strictly proportionate to the situation faced by law enforcement, which means authorities must not cause more harm than they seek to avert.

“At a time when the country is facing a dire economic crisis and protests are growing in scale, authorities must make comprehensive efforts to de-escalate the situation and focus resources on ensuring people can access essential goods and services, in line with international human rights law and standards,” said Yamini Mishra.

The post Sri Lanka: Authorities must refrain from use of military to police protests appeared first on Amnesty International.