Hungary: Historic opportunity to reverse human rights rollback

Responding to news that Péter Magyar’s opposition party won the Hungarian national election in a landslide victory, Amnesty International Hungary’s director, Dávid Vig said:

“This is a historic moment for Hungary. After 16 years of a government intent on ignoring human rights and dismantling the rule of law, the majority of Hungarians voted for change. This represents a momentous opportunity for Hungary to reverse the human rights rollback the country has experienced and return to a path where human rights are at the centre of all government policies.”

After 16 years of a government intent on ignoring human rights and dismantling the rule of law, the majority of Hungarians voted for change

“The new government should immediately reinstate and strengthen the independence of institutions that protect Hungarians from abuse of power, stop all government-organized hate campaigns against vulnerable groups and repeal or amend all laws, policies and practices that violate human rights. It is also crucial that they engage in a meaningful dialogue with independent civil society organizations to make sure that human rights and rule of law are at the heart of policy-making.”

The post Hungary: Historic opportunity to reverse human rights rollback appeared first on Amnesty International.

Venezuela: Amnesty law must not become a mechanism of repression

Nearly two months after the approval of the amnesty law intended to grant freedom to people prosecuted and detained for political reasons in Venezuela, Amnesty International reminds the Venezuelan authorities that its implementation must not rely on discretionary criteria that perpetuate the political repression the law is, in theory, intended to remedy. In this regard, Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International, said:

“The same arbitrariness with which Venezuela has imprisoned thousands of people in recent years now defines how courts selectively apply the amnesty law, materializing the risk long denounced by human rights organizations regarding the urgent need to provide redress to tens of thousands of people detained for political reasons in the country.”

The same arbitrariness with which Venezuela has imprisoned thousands of people in recent years now defines how courts selectively apply the amnesty law.”

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International

“Although hundreds of people have benefited from the law, hundreds of others have seen their amnesty requests rejected, without clear criteria or procedures ensuring access to impartial justice. For example, amnesty has been denied without explanation to Samantha Hernández, a 16-year-old charged with ‘terrorism’, and to Perkins Rocha, a lawyer who had been granted house arrest,” Piquer continued.

“This is just a small example of the pattern of arbitrariness and discretion through which Venezuelan authorities continue to systematically violate human rights. All of this must be investigated at the highest level. International justice must prevail and provide victims, their families and society as a whole with the reparation they deserve,” concluded Ana Piquer.

This is just a small example of the pattern of arbitrariness and discretion through which Venezuelan authorities continue to systematically violate human rights.”

Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty International

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact press@amnesty.org

The post Venezuela: Amnesty law must not become a mechanism of repression appeared first on Amnesty International.

Sudan: High-income countries must use Berlin meeting to save lives as conflict hits three-year mark   

International donors attending the aid conference for Sudan must secure increased funding and pressure warring parties to ensure unhindered humanitarian access to allow lifesaving healthcare services to be delivered in the country to civilians, including survivors of sexual violence, Amnesty International said today, ahead of the International Ministerial Conference on Sudan in Berlin on 15 April.

As aid has declined in Sudan, the needs have only increased. Behind these numbers are real lives, real people who have lost their homes, loved ones and livelihoods, who are fighting to survive the war and the disease and hunger it brings

Tigere Chagutah, Regional Director, Amnesty International, ESARO

Three years of conflict between the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and their respective allies have created a humanitarian and health crisis in Sudan, with more than 33 million people in need of assistance. Yet, ongoing cuts to international foreign aid are threatening efforts to tackle a host of grave health risks, including malnutrition, cholera, trauma and injury.

“As aid has declined in Sudan, the needs have only increased. Behind these numbers are real lives, real people who have lost their homes, loved ones and livelihoods, who are fighting to survive the war and the disease and hunger it brings,” said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and South Africa.

“The Berlin meeting must not be another talking shop. International donors must seize this opportunity to commit more funding to frontline non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in Sudan. They must recognize the terrible suffering of civilians and take meaningful action to alleviate it.

This urgently needed donor funding must be matched with redoubled diplomatic efforts by the international community to protect civilians – including humanitarians, health workers and local responders – and to push for accountability and justice for violations across Sudan”

Dire consequences of precarious funding

In late 2025, Amnesty International spoke to seven NGOs which either directly provide services – ranging from fuel deliveries to hospitals, to post-rape care for children in Sudan – or monitor human rights violations. Amnesty International also interviewed many people who had fled the country.

All the NGOs said insufficient funding had disrupted their operations – either forcing them to shut down or reduce their workforce. Some were lacking basic medicines, such as painkillers and antibiotics. For one international NGO (INGO), a limited supply of antibiotics led to tough decisions about who to prioritize for care.

The Berlin meeting must not be another talking shop. International donors must seize this opportunity to commit more funding to frontline non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in Sudan. They must recognize the terrible suffering of civilians and take meaningful action to alleviate it.

Tigere Chagutah

One INGO told Amnesty International that it is in desperate need for ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), a nutrient dense paste designed to treat children with severe acute malnutrition, and that it can only meet the needs of 50 per cent of the cases.  CARE International estimates that up to 80 per cent of community kitchens have closed due to aid cuts, further worsening the malnutrition crisis.

Women and children disproportionately impacted

Health services for survivors of the widespread sexual violence that has been committed by all parties to the conflict has been significantly affected by aid cuts.

One women’s rights defender and activist told Amnesty International that grassroots groups had already been receiving very little lifesaving funding: “And then, after the funding cuts and setbacks to donor commitments, they are getting nothing. And that has influenced the fact that hundreds of women and little girls are being abandoned completely.”

She described access to sexual reproductive healthcare as “chaos” and said that, for survivors of sexual violence with traumatic fistula, the situation is “beyond painful.”

The escalating conflict in Sudan has caused over 4.5 million people to flee to neighbouring countries. In February, the United Nations issued an appeal for US$1.6 billion to support refugees across the region.

And then, after the funding cuts and setbacks to donor commitments, they are getting nothing. And that has influenced the fact that hundreds of women and little girls are being abandoned completely.

Activist

Some of the most at risk among them are children and adults with disabilities. Many living in displacement camps in Chad told Amnesty International of their struggles to access education and healthcare, as well as the wheelchairs and other devices that they need to move around

Yagoub*, 17, now walks with a crutch and has limited mobility after having been shot in the leg by the RSF in his village in North Darfur. He told Amnesty International he could not afford to pay for surgery to remove the shrapnel still lodged in his body: “[The medical staff] referred me to an advanced hospital… to do [an] x-ray and ultrasound… I need a lot of money… According to my previous consultation, surgery costs about 5 million Sudanese pounds (US$ 1,470).”

Yagoub said he could not go to school because it would take 10 to 20 minutes of walking to get there and he had no assistance to help him reach it.

Makawi*, a 15-year-old boy with what appears to be cerebral palsy, fled North Darfur while carried on his grandmother’s back. Without a wheelchair he cannot manoeuvre around the refugee camp in Chad where he now lives. There are no toilets or showers near the tent he shares with his grandmother: “If I need to go [to the toilet] at night, it is almost impossible.”

Makawi dreams of going to school, but it is a struggle to reach the school and too costly.

Political commitments must translate to increased aid

For NGOs working in Sudan, working on healthcare in a conflict can be complex and costly. Start-and-stop funding by donors has made it especially hard. NGOs explained that programmes must be planned months in advance, because bank systems have collapsed, and transport and security are hard to come by.

The picture described is one of scarcity and widespread violations of the rights to health and life. As one INGO leader said: “You will find the organizations still existing on the ground. But if you talk about, are you able to get enough supplies to support these facilities? My answer would be no. Are you able to get enough nutritional food for these health facilities? I will say no. Are you able to get enough immunizations or the vaccines for these facilities? My answer will be no… We don’t know what will happen tomorrow.”

According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, US funding for Sudan’s coordinated humanitarian plan halved between 2024 and 2025, and in 2025 less than 40% of the plan was financed by all donors.

In a welcome decision, following an Independent Commission for Aid Impact report on UK funding in Sudan, the UK foreign office recently prioritized Sudan and a focus on women and girls, but there remain questions around how these commitments will be delivered against a backdrop of drastic cuts to UK development staff and programs.

“It is vital that human rights, including the rights to food, health, housing, education, and water for millions of civilians are upheld despite the escalating conflict. To realise these rights, donors must urgently ensure sufficient international aid to meet essential immediate needs while also taking other longer term necessary measures such as debt relief including cancellation, to allow Sudan to spend more on vital public goods and services,” Said Tigere Chagutah

For decades, high-income states have had high level political commitments to allocate at least 0.7 per cent of their Gross National Income to overseas aid and, under international human rights law and standards, many states also have extraterritorial obligations to guarantee human rights. This commitment should translate to increased humanitarian aid for Sudanese NGOs to enable them respond to health emergencies.

Sudan, like other highly aid dependent countries in protracted conflicts, need the international community to act.

  • Names have been changed to protect identities of the interviewees

More reading

https://www.amnesty.eu/news/eu-must-act-for-sudans-civilians-three-years-of-conflict/

The post Sudan: High-income countries must use Berlin meeting to save lives as conflict hits three-year mark    appeared first on Amnesty International.

Eswatini: Supreme Court ruling on legal access offers limited relief for US deportees

Responding to the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling confirming a High Court order granting lawyers access to individuals unlawfully removed by the United States (US), flown to Eswatini and held at Matsapha Correctional Complex, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, Vongai Chikwanda, said:

“The Supreme Court’s ruling is an important step towards upholding the right to access a lawyer for people who have been unlawfully transferred by the US to Eswatini. However, it fails to resolve the deeper human rights violations at the heart of this abusive practice involving third-country removals. Amnesty International remains deeply concerned that these men continue to be arbitrarily detained.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is an important step towards upholding the right to access a lawyer for people who have been unlawfully transferred by the US to Eswatini.

Vongai Chikwanda, Deputy Regional Director, Amnesty ESARO

“Access to legal counsel is essential, but it cannot by itself redress the continuing  arbitrary detention.

“The Eswatini authorities must now fully and effectively implement the Supreme Court order, ensure immediate and confidential access to lawyers, disclose the legal basis for the men’s continued detention or grant their release, and guarantee that every individual is able to challenge any onward removal.

Reports that Eswatini has agreed to receive many more deportees makes it all the more urgent that Eswatini and the US authorities immediately end this deeply abusive practice.

Vongai Chikwanda

“No one should be transferred to a country in violation of international law guarantees, then detained in secrecy without clear legal process, access to lawyers, and protection against onward unlawful removal. Reports that Eswatini has agreed to receive many more deportees makes it all the more urgent that Eswatini and the US authorities immediately end this deeply abusive practice.”

Background

In July 2025, the US removed a first group of five people to Eswatini where they were kept in arbitrary detention. This was followed by the removal of a further 10 individuals from the US to the Southern African country in October 2025.   In March, four more men were transferred to the country and were detained at Matsapha Correctional Complex.

In August 2025, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights raised concerns regarding US removals of third-country nationals into African countries, including Eswatini.

The post Eswatini: Supreme Court ruling on legal access offers limited relief for US deportees appeared first on Amnesty International.