Colombia: Amnesty International calls for dialogue with national government over grave human rights situation

An Amnesty International delegation led by its Americas director, Erika Guevara-Rosas, has arrived in Colombia to engage in dialogue with the authorities about the grave human rights situation in the country.

“In accompaniment with victims of human rights violations and courageous Colombian organizations, we have requested meetings with President Iván Duque and other senior officials of his administration, in the hope that they will show willingness to urgently address the grave human rights crisis in the country,” said Erika Guevara-Rosas.

“These are matters of life and death that affect millions of people in Colombia. From impunity for police violence in the context of repression of protests, and the devastating consequences of the armed conflict on historically marginalized communities, to the grave situation faced by human rights defenders and community leaders – with Colombia being the most lethal country in the world for human rights defenders – these are issues that require a firm response from the government. We hope that President Duque will be willing to engage in dialogue and seek solutions.”

Launch of the report “Shoot on Sight: Eye Trauma in the Context of the National Strike”

Amnesty International, Temblores NGO and the Programa de Acción por la Igualdad y la Inclusión Social (PAIIS) of the University of the Andes will present their new report “Shoot on Sight: Eye Trauma in the Context of the National Strike” at a press conference on Friday 26 November at 10 a.m. local time at the Centro de Memoria Paz y Reconciliación (Carrera 19b #24 – 86, Bogotá).

To attend the event, journalists must register here.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Duncan Tucker: duncan.tucker@amnesty.org

The post Colombia: Amnesty International calls for dialogue with national government over grave human rights situation appeared first on Amnesty International.

Egypt: End Harassment of rights activist and journalist Hossam Bahgat

Verdict on Hossam Bahgat Speech Charges Due November 29

(Beirut) – Egyptian authorities should cease the harassment and persecution of prominent human rights defender and journalist, Hossam Bahgat, who faces abusive charges intended to punish him solely for exercising his right to freedom of expression and his human rights activism, 46 human rights organizations said today.

The verdict in the trial of Hossam Bahgat, executive director and founder of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), is expected on November 29, 2021. Bahgat is charged with “insulting the Elections Authority,” “spreading false news,” and “using a social media account to commit these crimes” in response to a tweet he posted criticizing the former head of Egypt’s National Elections Authority, the late Lashin Ibrahim, for his oversight of parliamentary elections. This case is the latest salvo in a years-long campaign targeting Hossam Bahgat who is well-known for his human rights activism and investigative journalism.

“The Egyptian government needs to halt its relentless persecution of Hossam Bahgat,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “These endless legal proceedings look like a clear reprisal against Bahgat’s storied legacy of defending human rights.”

The charges against Bahgat carry a penalty of up to three years in prison and a fine of up to EGP 330,000 (US$19,000) under Egypt’s penal code and 2018 cybercrime law.

In 2016, the authorities arbitrarily banned Hossam Bahgat from traveling and froze his assets in relation to Case 173, known as the infamous “foreign funding” case, a decade-long abusive criminal investigation that targeted dozens of nongovernmental organizations – unjust restrictions that remain in place today. In July 2021, an investigative judge in Case 173 summoned Hossam Bahgat and interrogated him on the basis of investigations by the notorious National Security Agency (NSA) accusing him of inciting the public against state institutions. While the investigative judges dropped their investigations against 75 NGOs and some 220 activists and employees, Hossam Bahgat and the EIPR remain subject to the ongoing investigation. In November 2015, Egyptian authorities unlawfully detained Bahgat for three days on charges of publishing false news following his investigation published by the independent news site Mada Masr detailing the military trial of several military officers in relation to a plan to overthrow the government.

“The Egyptian government’s retaliation against Hossam and other EIPR leaders is a threat to the human rights community in Egypt and part of a pattern that threatens to cripple civil society,” said Mohamed Zaree, head of the Egypt program at the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies. “We strongly condemn this clear pattern of harassment and intimidation against Hossam Bahgat solely because he insists on exercising his right to free expression.”

In November 2020, three top EIPR staff members – Gasser Abdel-Razek, Karim Ennarah, and Mohamed Basheer – were arrested and detained for several days on unfounded terrorism charges following their meeting with European diplomats about Egypt’s human rights crisis. They were released within days following a global outcry but all three remain subject to travel bans and asset freezes.

In February 2020, the authorities arrested Patrick George Zaki, a gender and sexuality rights researcher at EIPR, on his arrival at Cairo Airport from Italy, where he had been studying. During his detention, NSA officers subjected him to torture through the use of electric shocks and beatings, according to sources familiar with the case. After 19 months of detention without trial, prosecutors referred him to an Emergency State Security Court for trial over unfounded “disseminating false news” charges which is set to resume on December 7, 2021.

“As part of their unrelenting assault on the human rights movement, Egyptian authorities have a long track record of targeting Hossam Bahgat and other directors and staff at EIPR, one of Egypt’s leading human rights organizations, through unjust prosecutions, arbitrary arrests and detention, travel bans and asset freezes,” said Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Research and Advocacy Director, Philip Luther. “Egyptian authorities must halt their endless misuse of the justice system and drop all spurious charges against Hossam Bahgat, close Case 173 once and for all, and lift arbitrary travel bans and asset freezes.”

Signatory Organizations:

  1. Amnesty International
  2. Human Rights Watch
  3. The Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI)
  4. Egyptian Front for Human Rights (EFHR)
  5. Committee for Justice (CFJ) كوميتي فور جستس
  6. Human Rights First
  7. EuroMed Rights
  8. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies مركز القاهرة لدراسات حقوق الإنسان
  9. Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN)
  10. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
  11. World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
  12. Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED)
  13. International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
  14. International Service For Human Rights (ISHR)
  15. Sinai Foundation for Human Rights
  16. The Freedom Initiative
  17. Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms. 
  18. The Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy (TIMEP)
  19. Andalus Institute for Tolerance and Anti-Violence Studies
  20. DIGNITY
  21. Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression (AFTE)
  22. El Nadeem Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence and Torture (El Nadeem Center)
  23. Intersection Association for Rights and Freedoms
  24. DefendDefenders (East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project)
  25. Egyptian Human Rights Forum
  26. EgyptWide
  27. ARTICLE 19
  28. US Committee to End Political Repression in Egypt
  29. Democratic Transition & Human Rights Support Center (DAAM)
  30. Nachaz-Dissonances (جمعية نشاز)
  31. Association for the Promotion of the right to difference (ADD)-Tunisia
  32. Association CALAM- Tunisia
  33. Danseurs Citoyens Sud – Tunisia
  34. L’association “By Lhwem”- Tunisia
  35. Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights – Tunisia
  36. OUTCAST – Tunisia
  37. L’Association tunisienne pour la défense des libertés individuelles (ADLI) – Tunisia
  38. Jeunes Leaders de Tunis – Tunisia
  39. L’association BEITY- Tunisia
  40. Association des Femmes Tunisiennes pour la Recherche sur le Développement (AFTURD) – Tunisia
  41. National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists (SNJT)
  42. Tunisian Human Rights League
  43. NOMAD08 – Tunisia
  44. L’Association tunisienne des études sur le genre – Tunisia
  45. International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute

The post Egypt: End Harassment of rights activist and journalist Hossam Bahgat appeared first on Amnesty International.

Pakistan: New briefing documents far-reaching impact of enforced disappearance on families of the vanished

The Pakistani authorities must end their abhorrent use of enforced disappearance, said Amnesty International, in a new briefing today detailing the practice’s devastating impact on the families of those vanished. 

The briefing, Living Ghosts, documents how enforced disappearance–a crime under international law in which state agents deny holding an individual or refuse to provide information on their fate or whereabouts–not only violates the human rights of the individuals who are disappeared, but also impacts affected families’ mental and physical health, financial status, and security, as well as leading to stigma and social isolation.  

Although cases have been documented as far back as the mid-1980s, the practice has been routinely used by Pakistan’s intelligence services since the inception of the so-called “War on Terror” in 2001, to target human rights defenders, political activists, students, and journalists, with the fate of hundreds of victims still unknown. A proposed amendment to outlaw enforced disappearance has been mired in the legislative process for more than two and a half years and the current iteration does not conform with international human rights law and best practices. 

Enforced disappearance is a cruel practice that has caused indelible pain to hundreds of families in Pakistan over the past two decades

Rehab Mahamoor, Amnesty International’s Acting South Asia Researcher

“Enforced disappearance is a cruel practice that has caused indelible pain to hundreds of families in Pakistan over the past two decades. On top of the untold anguish of losing a loved one and having no idea of their whereabouts or safety, families endure other long-term effects including ill-health and financial problems,” said Rehab Mahamoor, Amnesty International’s Acting South Asia Researcher.   

“It’s a punishment without end that Pakistan’s authorities must consign to history. As well as expediting the criminalization of enforced disappearance through legislation in line with international human rights law, the authorities must immediately disclose the fate and whereabouts of all victims to their families and release those still being held.” 

Amnesty International is also calling for all those suspected of criminal responsibility for committing an enforced disappearance to be brought to justice in fair trials before ordinary civilian courts and without recourse to the death penalty. 

Amnesty International spoke to the family members of 10 people whose fate remains unknown after they were abducted by Pakistan’s security services. Each of them described resultant stress-related health issues including high blood pressure, cardiac conditions, and gastro-intestinal illnesses. 

Affected families also suffer financial consequences, as the disappeared are invariably the main breadwinner. In three cases documented by Amnesty International, the children of those disappeared had been forced to drop out of school due to the loss of family income or stigma. 

Sultan Mahmood, whose two brothers were abducted in 2014 and 2021 respectively, told Amnesty International that losing two sources of family income, combined with the legal costs of trying to secure the return of his brothers, had left him in debt of 2.5 million PKR (approx USD 15K), forcing him to sell all of his assets, including his home.   

In another case, the younger sister of Sammi Baloch, a prominent activist against enforced disappearance whose father was disappeared by the authorities in 2009, was prevented from sitting exams at a college in Balochistan managed by the army, after officials became aware who she was related to.  

The families of those forcibly disappeared often face an impossible choice between staying silent in the aftermath of an abduction or risking the loss of their loved one forever. Intimidation and harassment from the authorities can follow them for years after a disappearance has taken place and sometimes continues after the person is returned. This can be in the form of heavy-handed surveillance, threatening calls from blocked numbers and even phishing attacks on personal devices.  

Amnesty International also interviewed victims of enforced disappearance, including Inaam Abbasi, who was held for 10 months following his abduction in August 2017. The physical torture he was subjected to has left him with a host of health issues, including chronic joint pain, high blood pressure and suspected post-traumatic stress disorder, which can be triggered by events such as a doorbell ringing. “I believe that someone has come to take me away again,” he told Amnesty. 

Last month, Amnesty International criticized a range of proposed reforms to the amendment to the Penal Code of Pakistan to end the practice of enforced disappearance, which does not currently conform with international human rights law and best practices. 

On 8 November, the Minister of Human Rights, Dr Shireen Mazari, tweeted that the National Assembly had passed the proposed legislation. According to her tweet, one of the controversial sections in the proposed amendment, which sought to protect state officials, department heads or heads of institutions from being held accountable for disappearances, had been removed. The legislation remains in contravention of international human rights law and standards.

The post Pakistan: New briefing documents far-reaching impact of enforced disappearance on families of the vanished appeared first on Amnesty International.

Colombia: Only a robust and coordinated state response will resolve the situation of grave risk faced by human rights defenders

Colombia has failed to comply with its international obligation to guarantee a safe and enabling space for the defence of human rights in the country, but today it has the opportunity to change this, Amnesty International said at a public hearing in Congress on the situation of human rights defenders in Colombia today.

“The Colombian state is still failing to address its historical failure to put in place a comprehensive response to the dangerous situation defenders face in the country. Threats and attacks against human rights defenders continue to occur day after day, making Colombia once again the most lethal country to defend human rights,” said Fernanda Doz Costa, deputy director of research for the Americas at Amnesty International. 

“The hearing in Congress is a unique opportunity to set out a path for Colombia to make progress in protecting human rights defenders and to discuss how authorities that do not act diligently to address the grave situation faced by human rights defenders in the country can be held to account.”

In recent years, Front Line Defenders and Global Witness have consistently ranked Colombia as the country with the highest number of killings of environmentalists and human rights defenders in the world.

Threats and attacks against human rights defenders continue to occur day after day, making Colombia once again the most lethal country to defend human rights.

Fernanda Doz Costa, deputy director of research for the Americas at Amnesty International

In October 2020, Amnesty International set out a series of recommendations for the comprehensive protection of defenders at national level and in four cases in particular. However, to date, the Colombian authorities have done very little to guarantee safe conditions for the defence of human rights in the country. They continue to promote a protection model that has proven to be ineffective because it is based solely on material protection measures; on issuing laws, decrees and regulations that lack the means to ensure that they are properly implemented; and on measures aimed at individual protection rather than a collective approach.

Likewise, the authorities have made very slow progress on various processes that could address the structural causes of violence, including investigating threats and attacks, recognizing Indigenous territories and dismantling armed groups. On the contrary, they have adopted measures that increase the dangers defenders face, such as, for example, the decision to resume the forced eradication of illicit crops and to reduce National Protection Unit protection schemes during the pandemic.

The Colombian Congress has called a public hearing on the issue today to demand accountability for the lack of security guarantees for human rights defenders and civil society leaders in the country. Civil society organizations and defenders will participate in the hearing, such as María Ciro, a representative of the Catatumbo Social Integration Committee (CISCA), who are having to live with risk because of their work defending human rights and lack adequate protection from the state. State institutions responsible for guaranteeing their protection are also expected to participate.

The hearing in Congress is a unique opportunity to set out a path for Colombia to make progress in protecting human rights defenders

Fernanda Doz Costa, deputy director of research for the Americas at Amnesty International 

The case of defender Jani Silva is an example of the lack of an adequate response from the Colombian authorities. Throughout 2021, she has been the victim of a number of threats from armed groups for her work defending human rights, even though she has been given material protection measures by the National Protection Unit and has been granted precautionary measures by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The latest incident resulted in her being forcibly displaced due to the high risks she faces. As long as the authorities do not adopt measures that can mitigate the structural causes that put Jani Silva at risk, she will remain in danger, compromising her defence of human rights. 

The organization also notes that the Ministry of the Interior has not succeeded in establishing collective protection plans for the Association for the Integral and Sustainable Development of the Amazonian Pearl (ADISPA), the Black Communities’ Process (PCN) or the ASEIMPOME Indigenous community, despite the fact that they were requested several years ago. The slowness of the Ministry of the Interior in establishing collective protection plans shows that the authorities have not been able to address the structural causes of violence against individuals and groups who risk their lives to defend human rights.

“The state continues to address the risk faced by human rights defenders from a totally regulatory, material and individual perspective, and not from a practical, collective and transformative perspective. The protection of defenders should not be based solely on theory, but on the practical measures and the solutions put forward by the individuals and groups at risk themselves. If the authorities listened to their voices, there would be a significantly safer environment for defending human rights in Colombia,” said Fernanda Doz Costa.

“All three branches of the state have human rights obligations, so it is imperative that Congress makes the issue of defenders a permanent part of its agenda, including through the creation of a Commission for the Verification of Guarantees for Human Rights Defenders that can hold to account those officials in the Executive who do not fulfill their duty of protection”.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Duncan Tucker: duncan.tucker@amnesty.org

The post Colombia: Only a robust and coordinated state response will resolve the situation of grave risk faced by human rights defenders appeared first on Amnesty International.

Qatar: Ensure fair trial for Abdullah Ibhais

Abdullah Ibhais, the former communications director for Qatar’s 2022 World Cup organizers the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy, is today entering his fifth day of hunger strike after being arrested and arbitrarily detained on 15 November.  

Abdullah’s case has been fraught with fair trial violations, and he is now on hunger strike in protest at his latest arrest

Lynn Maalouf, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa

Abdullah, a Jordanian national, is currently appealing a five-year prison sentence which, according to Human Rights Watch, was handed down after an unfair trial based on a coerced ‘confession’ he made without a lawyer present. The appeal process was ongoing when police seized Abdullah from his home in the early hours of Monday morning.  

“We are deeply concerned by the detention of Abdullah Ibhais, who has already been subjected to multiple violations at the hands of the Qatari authorities. His case has been fraught with fair trial violations, and he is now on hunger strike in protest at his latest arrest,” said Lynn Maalouf, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.   

“Abdullah Ibhais was arrested just days after he spoke publicly about his case, in what appears to amount to arbitrary detention in retaliation for speaking out about his experiences.  

“Qatari authorities must immediately launch an independent investigation into Abdullah’s claims of ill-treatment, and quash his conviction and sentence if they are found to have been based on a coerced ‘confession’. Qatar must ensure fair trial standards are upheld in all cases, including ensuring all defendants are provided with legal representation from the moment of their arrest.” 

Background

According to Human Rights Watch and FairSquare, Abdullah Ibhais was initially arrested on 12 November 2019 on charges of misuse of public funds, bribery, collusion to commit bribery, and causing harm to the Supreme Committee. He was detained for nearly six weeks, and for the first nine days was denied access to a lawyer. He was released from detention on 21 December 2019 and subjected to an unfair trial based on a “confession” obtained through threat and coercion.  

In April 2021 Abdullah Ibhais was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison, a verdict which he is now appealing. His next appeal hearing is scheduled for 23 November, where he is expected to present his defence.  

The Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy is the Qatari government body in charge of planning and delivering the 2022 FIFA World Cup.   

The post Qatar: Ensure fair trial for Abdullah Ibhais appeared first on Amnesty International.