This is how sex workers fight torture and gender-based violence

Latin America and the Caribbean suffer from high levels of gender-based violence that are rarely investigated effectively. For those who engage in sex work, the large number of abuses, particularly at the hands of state officials, is compounded by profound discrimination that makes it almost impossible for them to obtain justice.

According to research published this week by the Network of Latin American and Caribbean Sex Workers (Red de Trabajadoras Sexuales de Latinoamérica y el Caribe, RedTraSex) more than 1,200 sex workers in 15 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean reported having experienced some form of human rights abuse since 2016. Among the abuses most frequently reported are discrimination, harassment, intimidation, threats, physical assault, rape and extortion.

According to their statements, most of these human rights violations occurred at the hands of state officials, including the police. In most cases, the victims decided not to file a complaint out of fear, because the perpetrator belonged to one of the security forces, or because they knew their complaint would not go anywhere. They had reason not to trust the system. Those who try to file complaints are often demoralized by the process, ignored or mistreated.

For migrant sex workers, the situation is even more difficult. The fear of being deported, combined with the xenophobia that many of them face on a daily basis, create barriers that are difficult to overcome.

The findings of the RedTraSEx research are consistent with a series of reports by Amnesty International on the situation of vulnerability and abuse experienced by many sex workers around the world.

In March 2019, I personally met with various authorities in the Dominican Republic to discuss the findings of Amnesty International research that found that in the Caribbean country police routinely humiliate, insult and abuse sex workers. They do so as a form of social control, designed to punish them for transgressing social norms of “acceptable” femininity and sexuality.

Even though this type of violence by the police amounts to torture or ill-treatment under international law, states tend to do little to stop it. This is, in part, because the abuses are a consequence of the high levels of stigma and discrimination that sex workers face in many societies.

Verónica Lino, who has been engaging in sex work and activism in Cochabamba for more than 15 years, says that in Bolivia, where sex work is partially regulated, exploitation and abuse are also commonplace. She explains that the system tends to favour the landlords of the premises where women work and rent rooms and that working conditions are generally very poor.

With the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic, things got even worse.

“When the stores closed and you couldn’t go to work for eight months, the girls no longer knew how they were going to eat. Many began to sell their things. Many lost the rooms where they lived. You couldn’t live any more and nobody did anything for this sector,” explains Veronica.

Without a place to take their clients, or support from the authorities, the workers began to organize. First they set up a WhatsApp group where they discussed options, ideas, possible help and strategies. They could not work on the streets because there they were at greater risk of ill-treatment and torture by the police.

Veronica and 20 other sex workers began knocking on doors, demanding their rights. Without planning it, she became a role model for her co-workers. Complaints began to arrive along with the calls asking for help. Veronica learned how to document cases of abuse and support survivors fighting for justice. Today, she travels around the country collecting information and providing support for those who need it.

“Word is getting around. Co-workers are informing each other and so girls come to me to tell me about their problems. It is really shocking in some cases, very shocking. I have ended up crying with them many times because at that point a sex worker is so abused by the landlords, the security guards, the clients,” says Veronica and she describes how because of her human rights work some landlords will not rent her a place where she can work.

Although on paper, in their constitutions for example, most countries in the region protect everyone, including sex workers, from discrimination, and criminal codes tend not to categorize the sale and purchase of sex as a crime, in practice the lack of laws to protect sex workers from stigma, discrimination and violence, and the failure to investigate or prosecute the perpetrators, whether private individuals or state officials, leaves sex workers in a situation of extreme vulnerability.

Time and again when we have spoken with sex workers, they have said what they want is a place at the table, for their voices to be heard and their needs taken into account when public policies that affect them are developed.

Veronica and other organized sex workers are calling on states to recognize sex work as work. They say that a law that regulates sex work and recognizes and protects them would enable them to move out of the underground, providing a series of protections, the current absence of which leaves them at risk of abuse.

“With a law, we would have greater recognition,” she says. “Without it, they [governments] control our bodies.”

The post This is how sex workers fight torture and gender-based violence appeared first on Amnesty International.

End persecution of media as journalists collect ‘momentous’ Nobel Peace Prize

Responding to journalists Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov collecting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Amnesty International’s Secretary General Agnes Callamard said:

“For the first time in almost a century, the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to journalists, highlighting the bravery and outstanding achievements of media in an increasingly polarized world where facts and truth are under relentless attack.

“Amnesty congratulates Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov on this prestigious award. It is a momentous day for these champions and defenders of human rights and press freedom. We hope it inspires others to follow in their path and speak truth to power.

Amnesty congratulates Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov on this prestigious award. It is a momentous day for these champions and defenders of human rights and press freedom. We hope it inspires others to follow in their path and speak truth to power

Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“The Philippine government should immediately drop all charges against Ressa, who was almost prevented from attending the ceremony in Oslo because of the trumped-up and bogus cases against her. Russian authorities must stop harassing and intimidating media outlets by labeling them undesirable organizations or foreign agents.

“When media freedom is suppressed, it is peoples’ freedom of information that is threatened and rights that suffocate. Where the light of media freedom is dimmed, accountability to the people goes dark.  The evidence of those truths is all around us – sparing no country, no region, no political system. It is there in journalists killed, attacked, imprisoned, denied visas, threatened with extradition, silenced; in media outlets forced by governments to close, or in monopolies and special interests capturing media diversity, in journalistic enquiry being stripped of impartiality, accuracy, and objectivity.”

Background

Maria Ressa, the co-founder of Rappler, and Dmitry Muratov, who co-founded Novaya Gazeta, were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo for their defense of freedom of expression in the Philippines and Russia, respectively. For more information on Ressa and Muratov, see here.

The post End persecution of media as journalists collect ‘momentous’ Nobel Peace Prize appeared first on Amnesty International.

US/UK: “Travesty of justice” as extradition appeal fails to recognise that it would be unsafe for Julian Assange to be sent to the US

Responding to the High Court’s decision to accept the US’s appeal against the decision not to extradite Julian Assange Amnesty International’s Europe Director Nils Muižnieks said:

“This is a travesty of justice. By allowing this appeal, the High Court has chosen to accept the deeply flawed diplomatic assurances given by the US that Assange would not be held in solitary confinement in a maximum security prison. The fact that the US has reserved the right to change its mind at any time means that these assurances are not worth the paper they are written on.

“If extradited to the US, Julian Assange could not only face trial on charges under the Espionage Act but also a real risk of serious human rights violations due to detention conditions that could amount to torture or other ill-treatment.
“The US government’s indictment poses a grave threat to press freedom both in the United States and abroad. If upheld, it would undermine the key role of journalists and publishers in scrutinizing governments and exposing their misdeeds would leave journalists everywhere looking over their shoulders.”

BACKGROUND

The US extradition request is based on charges directly related to the publication of leaked classified documents as part of Julian Assange’s work with Wikileaks.
Publishing information that is in the public interest is a cornerstone of media freedom and the public’s right to information about government wrongdoing. It is also protected under international human rights law and should not be criminalized.

Julian Assange is the first publisher to face charges under the Espionage Act.

For more information or to arrange an interview contact Stefan Simanowitz press@amnesty.org

The post US/UK: “Travesty of justice” as extradition appeal fails to recognise that it would be unsafe for Julian Assange to be sent to the US appeared first on Amnesty International.

Iran: Amnesty launches Persian-language website amid escalating crisis of impunity

To mark Human Rights Day, Amnesty International today launches its first-ever Persian-language website to increase access to information on rights violations in Iran amid an escalating crisis of impunity – and what amounts to an all-out assault on human rights across the country.

The new website offers an overview of Amnesty International’s calls for justice, equality and freedom around the world, and features the organization’s statements and research on Iran, particularly over recent years.

It includes reports and legal analysis of shocking human rights violations committed by the Iranian authorities, and recommendations to the international community to tackle this crisis of impunity through the establishment of an independent mechanism to collect, preserve and analyze evidence of the most serious crimes under international law committed in Iran to facilitate future criminal proceedings.   

“The website arrives as Iran suffers from a deepening human rights crisis, with hundreds of individuals on death row following unfair trials – including those arrested as children – and thousands persecuted or arbitrarily detained for peacefully exercising their human rights. Meanwhile, the families of thousands of people killed or forcibly disappeared by the authorities are left waiting for truth and justice,” Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International, Diana Eltahawy, said.

“Human rights defenders and dissidents who do speak out against repression and injustice endure grave human rights violations while the Iranian authorities have rained down bullets on protesters who take to the streets, inflicting deaths and serious injuries. Our new Persian-language website will serve as a torchlight that illuminates and exposes these crimes.”

The website features Amnesty International’s documentation of the Iranian authorities’ lethal crackdowns on protests in November 2019, and more recently in 2021. It also contains reports on past and ongoing crimes against humanity related to the 1988 prison massacres. Meanwhile, hundreds of Urgent Actions and statements on behalf of people whose lives or physical security are at imminent risk are evidence of the torture epidemic in Iran’s prisons, the implementation of corporal punishments such as flogging and amputations and the use of the death penalty, including as a tool of political repression.

Amnesty International has documented human rights violations in Iran since the mid-1960s. The new website contains Persian translations of around 300 research reports, press releases, public statements and Urgent Actions related to Iran, and will be regularly updated with new publications.

“Amnesty International’s Persian-language website represents a major effort to increase access to information on human rights and further engage Persian-speaking audiences in Iran and around the world with the organization’s research, legal analysis and campaigning work,” said Diana Eltahawy.

“It also signifies Amnesty International’s ongoing commitment to support the people of Iran in their courageous struggle against repression and discrimination, while bolstering calls for truth, justice and reparations for the countless victims of arbitrary detention, discrimination, enforced disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment, extrajudicial executions or other unlawful killings.”

The new website also provides an overview of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Amnesty International’s research and activism around the world on 18 key concerns including armed conflict, child rights, climate change, corporate accountability, the death penalty, detention, discrimination, enforced disappearances, freedom of expression, Indigenous people, international justice, refugees and migrants, sexual and reproductive rights, and torture.   

While Amnesty International’s outputs on Iran generally appear in Persian or English, some reports on human rights violations and entrenched discrimination suffered by Iran’s ethnic minorities, including Ahwazi Arabs, Azerbaijani Turks and Kurds, have also been translated into Arabic, Turkish or Kurdish, and we will continue making these translations.

Amnesty’s founding and growth  

Founded in 1961 on the idea that, together, people can change the world, Amnesty International has since grown into a worldwide movement of over 10 million people who have campaigned for the release of tens of thousands of people unjustly imprisoned for their beliefs or peaceful activities. The movement has also contributed to the abolition of the death penalty in more than two-thirds of the world and achieved changes in laws and standards to combat torture and unfair trials.

Amnesty International campaigns for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all and those responsible for human rights violations are held to account. Only when the last unjustly detained man, woman or child has been freed, when the last torture chamber has been closed, when the death penalty has been abolished everywhere and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a reality for the world’s people, will our work be done.

Amnesty International maintains full independence from any and all governments, political ideologies, economic interests or religions. The organization neither seeks nor accepts any funds for human rights research from governments or political parties and we accept support only from businesses that have been carefully vetted.

The vast majority of the organization’s income comes from small donations from private individuals around the world who are committed to the cause of promoting and protecting human rights everywhere.

Amnesty International’s power to achieve impact is reinforced by its Urgent Action network, consisting of over half a million members globally who take action at short notice to defend people whose lives or physical security are at risk.

The post Iran: Amnesty launches Persian-language website amid escalating crisis of impunity appeared first on Amnesty International.

“I could send him books to prison. But they do not have a free minute there”. A story of 17-years old Mikita Zalatarou

On a hot day of 10 August 2020, Mikita Zalatarou was standing at a bus stop in the central square of the city of Homel in south-eastern Belarus. Everyone around him was intensely discussing the results of presidential elections that had just ended, and many people were protesting that day and the night before. The square was crowded. Mikita was just 16 and too young to vote that year.

Suddenly, through the street noise, he could hear someone shout “Run!” People rushed by him, and he instinctively ran with them fleeing the invisible danger. The crowd was chased by the riot police (OMON) – like everywhere else in Belarus, the security forces were ordered to disperse any gatherings. Alyaksandr Lukashenka immediately claimed victory in presidential elections despite the results being widely disputed – and the government was determined to shut down any dissent. Mikita’s life was about to be turned upside down, but he was yet to realise it.

The next day, several police offices came to his home to arrest him. Mikita was accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at two policemen during protests.

During that time, mass protests were happening across Belarus, including Homel. After presidential elections on 9 August, Alyaksandr Lukashenka declared himself the winner.

The night when the election results were announced, thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of Minsk, Homel, Brest and other cities to protest against Lukashenka’s declared victory. The authorities instantly responded to the peaceful demonstrations on 9 August and the following days with unprecedented violence and indiscriminate arrests. 

Peaceful demonstrators, civil society activists, journalists and bystanders who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, got arrested, questioned for hours, beaten and tortured. Over the following months, the mechanism of repressions kicked into high gear. Hundreds of dissenters faced criminal charges. The authorities closed down independent media outlets and NGOs; journalists were beaten and detained. People could lose their job or even life for their peaceful opinions. People from almost all social groups in Belarus, including medics, athletes or artists, were persecuted.

In just over a year since the start of protests and repressions, more than 30,000 people were detained after being charged with administrative offences related to their participation in peaceful demonstrations. The number of peaceful protesters, journalists and human rights defenders wrongfully sentenced to lengthy prison terms on criminal charges has been ever-growing.

Mikita was among the thousands arrested over the first days of protests. Following his arrest, he was taken to a police station where he was beaten and tortured with electric shocks. Seven months later, on 22 February 2021, in a stuffy courtroom, he was sentenced to five years in a penal colony by the Central District Court in Homel. 

The prosecution based its case on two main pieces of “evidence”: a video showing a person throwing a Molotov cocktail at policemen and the testimony of a taxi driver who had driven Mikita away from the city centre on 10 August. The person on the video footage was unidentifiable, and the taxi driver said that Mikita discarded a bottle in a trash bin before getting into his car. No other evidence of Mikita’s involvement in “mass disorder” was presented, and hardly could the events of that day in Homel be described as “mass disorder”.

Mikita was sent to a juvenile educational colony.

Educational Colony 2 No. 2 at 4 Batova Street in Bobruisk is a large facility behind a tall fence, surrounded by high-rise buildings. From the windows of the colony buildings, red and white chimneys of the Bobruisk Thermoelectric Power Plant can be seen.

[Mikita] would not admit even if things were bad [in prison] because all conversations are monitored.

Mikita's father

Mikita tells his parents very little about his life in prison. He keeps saying that everything is fine, but Mikhail, Mikita’s father, believes that “he would not admit [otherwise] even if things were bad because all conversations are monitored.” Mikita has been given some medications for epilepsy — a disorder he has been living with since childhood, but he does not what they are exactly.

His mother came to the colony to visit him not long ago. It took her a while to prepare for her 150 km journey from Homel to Bobruisk and pack all the food, medications and other necessary items. However, she was not let in. She stood at the closed gates for a long time until a guard approached her. He said that Mikita is all right, but refused to let her inside or take a parcel for her son.

Later, Mikita’s parents learned that at the time he had been placed in a punitive isolation cell where he spent almost two weeks. The reason for his punishment remains unknown. Upon his arrival to the educational colony, Mikita got a yellow label as an “extremist”. Now he has a red label that means “inclined to escaping”, and the reason for this also remains unknown. His parents say that now he has been treated more harshly.

According to human rights defenders, this kind of prisoner labelling is widespread in Belarusian correctional facilities, and the labels can often be predictors of how harsh the treatment of the prisoner will be.

I tell him to keep his head down, to learn, to study languages, English [for example]. I could send him books. But this is impossible: they are so busy there that they do not have a free minute.

Mikita's father

“I tell him to keep his head down, to learn, to study languages, English [for example]. I could send him books. But this is impossible: they are so busy there that they do not have a free minute,” his father says.

Mikita’s parents are hoping to find money to hire a lawyer, “kind of for moral support” — they do not believe in justice in Belarus anymore. Defence lawyers are compelled to sign non-disclose agreements regarding information on the cases they are working on. This practice is illegal, but if they refuse, they risk getting disbarred. So even having a lawyer visiting their son, Mikita’s parents still won’t be able to learn how he is doing, but at least they will know that someone has seen him alive. However, with widespread repression and the system set to break people’s spirit and strip them of rights and protections, this piece of knowledge will be worth it.

Mikita is not allowed to receive letters, but, as his father says with a bleak smile, “if the colony administration starts getting hundreds of letters from all over the world, it will drive them crazy.” “When this is over, we’ll go fishing together,” he promises.

Mikita must be released. Please join the call to release Mikita and give him a fair trial, ensuring he is treated in line with principles of child justice.

The post “I could send him books to prison. But they do not have a free minute there”. A story of 17-years old Mikita Zalatarou appeared first on Amnesty International.