Kyrgyzstan: Authorities must free journalist Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy and quash her wrongful conviction

On 2 February, Kyrgyzstan’s Supreme Court is expected to consider whether to resume proceedings against independent investigative journalist Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy, after her defence lawyers filed a petition requesting a full re-examination of her wrongful conviction.

The petition, which ultimately seeks her immediate release, follows a legal opinion published by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in October 2025. It concluded that Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy’s detention was arbitrary, violated multiple provisions of international human rights law and resulted directly from her lawful exercise of the right to freedom of expression.

Ahead of the Supreme Court hearing next week, Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director, said:

“The Kyrgyzstani authorities now have a clear and unavoidable choice: uphold their international human rights obligations or continue to defy them. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has unequivocally concluded that Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy’s imprisonment is unlawful, her conviction must be quashed, and she must be immediately released and compensated for the violations suffered. There is nothing ambiguous, optional or symbolic about this decision.”

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has unequivocally concluded that Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy’s imprisonment is unlawful, her conviction must be quashed, and she must be immediately released and compensated for the violations suffered

Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director

“Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy’s continuous detention sends a chilling message to all independent voices in Kyrgyzstan that reporting on corruption and human rights abuses comes at the price of freedom.”

“The hearing before the Supreme Court is an opportunity to demonstrate that international law and Kyrgyzstan’s own Constitution are not mere words on paper.”

Background

Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy was arrested along with 10 colleagues on 16 January 2024. They were charged with “calls for mass disorder” solely on the basis of their work for the independent investigative media projects, Temirov LIVE and Ayt Ayt Dese.  

On 10 October 2024, following a trial that failed to meet international fair trial standards, Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Appeal courts upheld the conviction.

The post Kyrgyzstan: Authorities must free journalist Makhabat Tazhibek-kyzy and quash her wrongful conviction appeared first on Amnesty International.

Italy: Cutro shipwreck trial begins after another deadly week in the Mediterranean

  • Amnesty International representatives will be present at the trial and spokespeople are available on request.

On 30 January, six Italian coastguard and custom officials will go on trial for failing to launch rescue operations which could have prevented a shipwreck that killed more than 90 people near the town of Cutro in southern Italy in February 2023.

At least 94 people, including 34 children, drowned in Italian territorial waters near Steccato di Cutro, Calabria, as the “Summer Love” vessel sank just metres from the Italian shoreline. An unknown number of people also went missing at sea.

Over 50 survivors and relatives of victims will be civil parties in the proceedings, as well as numerous NGOs. Amnesty International will observe the hearing, with Serena Chiodo, Campaign specialist on migration at Amnesty International Italy, present at the Crotone courthouse.

“This trial will try to establish any individual criminal responsibility for the deaths of dozens of people, including many children, which is fundamental to uphold the right of survivors and victims’ families to truth, justice and reparation. Crucially, it will also be an opportunity to shine a light on systemic failures and reckless decisions by the Italian authorities that may have contributed to the enormous loss of life,” said Serena Chiodo.

In the aftermath of the Cutro shipwreck, according to leaked documents, it emerged in recent years the government had unduly restricted the response to maritime distress calls regarding refugees and migrants, which could have contributed to the disaster. 

The trial comes amid a spate of deadly shipwrecks over the past week, with UN agencies estimating that hundreds of people may have drowned attempting to cross the Mediterranean.

“As recent days have once again shown, deadly shipwrecks in the Mediterranean are a brutal and ongoing reality. The Central Mediterranean continues to be one of the world’s most dangerous migration routes, exacerbated by European states’ failure to ensure adequate search and rescue operations and the ongoing crackdown on NGO rescue vessels by the Italian government.

“Those who drowned at Cutro could still be alive had authorities acted in line with their search and rescue obligations. Fewer people would be forced to make life-threatening journeys if European governments significantly increased access to safe and regular pathways for people fleeing desperate situations.”

Background

Between 25 and 26 February 2023, a wooden boat carrying about 200 people sank metres from the shore in the Italian region of Calabria. Local fishermen, like Vincenzo, volunteered in rescue efforts but for many people on board it was already too late.

International law imposes obligations on states in relation to search and rescue. These include ensuring arrangements for the prompt coordination of rescue operations and for the rescue of persons in distress at sea in their area of responsibility.

An investigation by Lighthouse Reports revealed information was available to Frontex and the Italian authorities several hours before the shipwreck, that could have prevented drownings, including in relation to bad weather conditions and the likely presence of refugees and migrants below deck.

Amnesty International highlighted shortcomings in relation to the authorities’ response to the incident and made recommendations for the Italian authorities in its calls for urgent review of search and rescue procedures and visa policies.

On 24 January, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) reported that the Central Mediterranean remains the deadliest migration route in the world, with at least 1,340 people losing their lives last year alone.

The post Italy: Cutro shipwreck trial begins after another deadly week in the Mediterranean appeared first on Amnesty International.

Egypt: Authorities must end crackdown on individuals discussing religious beliefs online

The Egyptian authorities have intensified their crackdown on religious expression online in recent months, said Amnesty International today, calling on the authorities to immediately and unconditionally release 23 people arbitrarily detained solely for peacefully exercising their right to freedom of religion and belief.

Over the past six months, security forces have arbitrarily arrested at least 29 people, including one woman, aged between 18 and their late fifties, across six governorates for having posted online content expressing religious views that do not align with state-sanctioned religious narratives, or simply for being members of social media groups discussing atheism and agnosticism and criticising mainstream religious beliefs. They are being investigated in connection with bogus charges of “contempt of religions” and “joining a group established in violation of law”. If convicted, they face up to five years in prison.

“Posting religious views online or taking part in discussions about belief or non-belief is not a crime. Yet the Egyptian authorities have intensified their crackdown on those discussing religious matters online in breach of the country’s international human rights obligations and more specifically the commitments the authorities made regarding freedom of religion during the country’s 2025 Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council,” said Mahmoud Shalaby, Egypt and Libya Researcher at Amnesty International.

“Egyptian authorities must stop criminalizing discussions about religious beliefs, including those deemed as divergent from socially dominant views, or sometimes purely for reflecting and questioning them. Authorities must immediately and unconditionally release those arbitrarily detained solely for peacefully exercising their right to freedom of religion or belief.”

Between mid-July 2025 and 1 January 2026, security officials subjected those arrested to enforced disappearance for periods ranging between four and 56 days. At least four detainees reported to prosecutors during their pretrial detention renewal sessions that they had been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment following arrest, while at least 11 were denied their right to legal counsel of their choosing during the interrogation phase. One detainee died in custody, according to statements his fellow inmates made to prosecutors during a pretrial detention renewal session in early January 2026. Amnesty International was unable to obtain information about the cause of death.

Egyptian authorities must end their restrictions on the right to freedom of religion or belief and stop prosecuting people based on what they believe.

Mahmoud Shalaby, Amnesty International

Five were released in early December 2025 pending investigations. The remaining 23 people are held in pretrial detention.

Amnesty International spoke with a relative of one detainee, two lawyers at the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms and two other lawyers representing 13 of the defendants.

Police arrested most detainees at their homes and seized their laptops and mobile phones, including some devices belonging to family members, without presenting arrest warrants or explaining the reasons for arrest.

A litany of violations during arrest

Upon arrest, security forces concealed the fate and whereabouts of those detained, thereby subjecting them to enforced disappearance. They were held outside the protection of the law in unknown National Security Agency (NSA) facilities for periods ranging from four to 56 days, at heightened risk of torture and other ill-treatment, before security forces brought them before the Supreme State Security Prosecution (SSSP). During their enforced disappearance in NSA facilities, agents interrogated detainees while blindfolded for hours about their religious beliefs, including whether they were Muslim or Christian and whether they prayed.

Among those arrested, was one man who ran a YouTube channel featuring debates or critical discussions about religious ideas; for instance discussing commonly held beliefs in Islam and Christianity, including on the occurrence of signs ahead of Judgement Day. Another posted online content critical of a popular Islamic preacher, while another discussed cosmic justice. A third man shared content satirizing certain religious practices.

Security forces arrested Sherif Gaber, 32, a blogger and YouTuber, at his home in Cairo on 3 November 2025 and subjected him to enforced disappearance for around 56 days before bringing him before a prosecutor. Since 2013, authorities have repeatedly targeted Gaber for his online religious expression. Between 2013 and 2024, courts sentenced him in absentia on three separate trials to one, three, and five years in prison in connection with “contempt of religions” charges. He remains detained pending investigations.

SSSP prosecutors opened investigations against detainees on a range of charges, including joining a group established in violation of the law, exploiting religion to promote ideas harmful to national unity, contempt of religions, insulting religions through public means, and spreading false news. Prosecutors subsequently ordered their pretrial detention.

During one of the pretrial detention renewal sessions, held online in late 2025, three defendants told prosecutors that NSA agents had subjected them to electric shocks during their enforced disappearance. Prosecutors failed to promptly and effectively investigate these allegations by referring detainees for forensic examination and instead stated that they would summon them to an in-person session where they could “report whatever they want.”

Saeed Abo Mustafa, one of the detainees who had participated in online debates about religious beliefs, told prosecutors during his first pretrial detention renewal session that NSA agents beat him with their knees or foot hitting his back and stomach during his enforced disappearance in July 2025. Prosecutors dismissed his complaint, asking why he had not reported the abuse during his initial interrogation.

“The authorities are piling abuse upon abuse against those arbitrarily detained, from bringing absurd charges against them, to subjecting them to enforced disappearance and dismissing their serious allegations of torture and other ill-treatment. The Public Prosecution must immediately stop its complicity in NSA abuses by rubber-stamping arbitrary detention, and ensuring prompt, thorough, independent, impartial, transparent and effective investigations into all allegations of torture and other ill-treatment”, said Mahmoud Shalaby.

“Egyptian authorities must end their restrictions on the right to freedom of religion or belief and stop prosecuting people based on what they believe.”

Background

Religious minorities, including Coptic Christians, Shi’a Muslims and Bahá’ís, consistently face discrimination in law and/or practice in Egypt. Members of religious minorities, atheists and others not espousing state-sanctioned religious beliefs face threats and harassment including abusive summons and interrogations by the NSA and in some cases prosecution over vague “contempt of religions” charges.

State officials continued to discriminate against Christians by denying effective remedies for sectarian violence and imposing customary reconciliation processes that deprived them of compensation and sometimes led to their banishment.

Since March 2025, at least 15 members of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light remain arbitrarily detained solely for peacefully exercising their right to freedom of religion. In April 2025, UN special procedures raised concerns with the Egyptian government over discrimination against the Baha’i community, including confiscation of cemeteries, denial of legal recognition and identity documents, and harassment of Baha’is.

The post Egypt: Authorities must end crackdown on individuals discussing religious beliefs online appeared first on Amnesty International.

Myanmar: Junta Atrocities Surge 5 Years since Coup

Myanmar’s military junta has committed widespread repression and abuse in every facet of life in the country since seizing power on February 1, 2021, Amnesty International, Fortify Rights, and Human Rights Watch said today. The military’s atrocities since the coup, which include war crimes and crimes against humanity, escalated over the past year as the junta sought to entrench its rule through abusive military operations and stage-managed elections.

United Nations Security Council members, governments in the region, and other concerned states should better support Myanmar’s people and act to hold the junta accountable for its crimes. The heavily controlled elections, held in three phases between December 28, 2025, and January 25, 2026, have been widely dismissed as fraudulent and organized to ensure the military-backed party’s electoral victory.

“It’s no accident that this election has been made possible through increased human rights abuses, from arbitrary detention to unlawful attacks on civilians, which has been the military’s modus operandi for decades,” said Ejaz Min Khant, human rights specialist at Fortify Rights. “As this crisis stretches into its sixth year, governments should focus on accountability and justice efforts for the many crimes committed by Myanmar’s military, without which the country cannot move forward.”

Since the coup, the junta has systematically banned dozens of political parties and detained more than 30,000 political prisoners. In January, the junta reported that it had taken legal action against more than 400 people under an “election protection” law passed in July criminalizing criticism of the election by banning speech, organizing, or protest that disrupts any part of the electoral process.

The elections have served as a centerpiece for the junta’s attempts to crush all political opposition, derail efforts to restore civilian rule, and entrench the military-controlled state. As expected, and by design, preliminary election results indicate a landslide victory for the military proxy Union Solidarity and Development Party.

China and Russia, the junta’s primary suppliers of aircraft and arms, both sent election observers to the polls. The two countries have long supported the junta while blocking international action on military atrocities at the UN Security Council. Malaysia, last year’s chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, said the bloc has not sent observers to certify the polls.

In expanded military operations ahead of the elections, the junta in 2025 ramped up its use of airstrikes, including deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure in violation of international humanitarian law. Airstrikes have hit schools, hospitals, religious sites, and camps for displaced people, killing thousands over the past year.

The military has also increasingly used armed drones, paramotors, and gyrocopters in unlawful attacks, creating new threats to civilians. On October 6, a military paramotor attack on a Buddhist festival in Sagaing Region killed at least 24 people, including three children. More than 135 paramotor attacks have been reported since December 2024. Myanmar is one of very few countries that continue to use internationally banned cluster munitions and antipersonnel landmines.

“The past five years are a bleak illustration of the Myanmar military’s failed strategy to assert control by killing and terrorizing civilians,” said Joe Freeman, Myanmar researcher at Amnesty International. “Military air and drone strikes reached new highs in 2025 as the junta intensified its already brutal campaign against opposition areas, leaving more and more people living in fear of bombs falling from the sky.”

Since enacting a conscription law in February 2024, the junta has used abusive tactics such as abducting young men and boys and detaining family members of missing conscripts as hostages. The military’s recruitment and use of child soldiers has surged since the coup.

Since the coup, more than 2,200 people have reportedly died in junta custody, although the actual figure is likely higher. Torture, sexual violence, and other ill-treatment are rampant in prisons, interrogation centers, military bases, and other detention sites, with reports of rape, beatings, prolonged stress positions, electric shock and burning, denial of medical care, and deprivation of food, water, and sleep. In July, Ma Wutt Yee Aung, a 26-year-old activist, died in Insein prison due to reported lack of medical treatment for long-term head injuries from torture.

Following the March 2025 earthquake that struck central Myanmar, the junta obstructed access to lifesaving services in opposition-held areas. The junta’s years of unlawful attacks on healthcare facilities and health workers severely hampered the emergency response. Despite announcing a ceasefire, the military carried out more than 550 attacks in the two months following the quake.

Military abuses and spiraling fighting have internally displaced at least 3.6 million people. Foreign aid cuts, skyrocketing prices, and restrictions on medical care and humanitarian supplies have exacerbated malnutrition, waterborne illness, and preventable deaths. Over 15 million people are facing acute food insecurity, with Rakhine State especially impacted.

Millions who have fled the country face increasing threats and risk of forced returns.

Since late 2023, Rohingya civilians have been caught amid fighting between the junta and ethnic Arakan Army forces. The Arakan Army has imposed oppressive measures against Rohingya in northern Rakhine State, including forced labor and arbitrary detention.

Since the coup, trafficking, scam centers, unregulated resource extraction, drug production, and other illicit operations have proliferated. Online scam centers along Myanmar’s border with Thailand—run by global criminal syndicates led by Chinese nationals—largely rely on human trafficking, forced labor, and torture to run their scams, which are part of a multibillion-dollar industry across the region.

The military’s widespread and systematic abuses have been fueled by decades of impunity and insufficient international efforts to end its violations.

Accountability measures underway at the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court (ICC) are vital but remain limited to atrocities prior to the coup. In November 2024, the ICC prosecutor requested an arrest warrant for commander-in-chief Sr. Gen. Min Aung Hlaing for alleged crimes against humanity committed in 2017; the judges have yet to issue a public decision on the request.

The UN Security Council has been largely deadlocked, failing to follow up on its December 2022 resolution, which denounced the military’s post-coup abuses, with tangible measures due to opposition from China and Russia.

Security Council members should outline targeted accountability measures to be taken against the junta for its refusal to comply with the council resolution and numerous other international calls. Holding regular open meetings on Myanmar can help build momentum for a follow-up resolution referring the whole country situation to the ICC and instituting a global embargo on arms and jet fuel.

“Five years after the coup, Myanmar’s human rights and humanitarian catastrophe faces dwindling foreign assistance and attention,” said Shayna Bauchner, Asia researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Ending this crisis requires sustained international pressure, meaningful accountability, and concrete humanitarian, political, and technical support for those in Myanmar and the millions forced to flee.”

The post Myanmar: Junta Atrocities Surge 5 Years since Coup appeared first on Amnesty International.

How is US President Trump impacting global climate action?

In 2024, for the first time, the global average temperature exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, making rapid coordinated global climate action even more urgent.

Instead of supporting a fast and just phase out of fossil fuels, US President Donald Trump is recklessly assaulting global efforts to combat climate change in five key ways, by:

  1. Withdrawing the US from global climate bodies
  2. Promoting a disinformation campaign against established climate science
  3. Using bullying and coercive measures to push pro-fossil fuel policies
  4. Weakening domestic climate protections and defunding climate science
  5. Restricting civic space which harms climate activism

Which global climate bodies have the US quit and what is the impact?

The USA’s withdrawal from the landmark Paris Agreement came into effect on 27 January 2026. This is the second time the US has withdrawn from the agreement and comes on the heels of its declared intent to withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Green Climate Fund (GCF). Trump has also called for the US’ departure from over 60 other international organizations, including several others related to climate change, biodiversity and renewable energy, calling them ‘wasteful, ineffective, or harmful’.

These announcements will likely accelerate the US’ defunding of key multilateral and bilateral climate institutions and programming.  US funding to these UN agencies and their critical work is expected to end imminently. The UN was already facing a financial crisis, exacerbated over the past year by the US’ refusal to pay its contribution to the regular budget. Trump also refused to spend money appropriated by Congress for foreign assistance, including to UN agencies, dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and other US agencies that provide direct support to communities harmed by climate change, and attacked programmes that address climate change.

What is the Paris Agreement and why is it important?

On 12 December 2015, states adopted the world’s most ambitious framework for fighting climate change during the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21). Under the Paris Agreement, governments agreed for the first time to try to limit global warming to 1.5° C above pre-industrial levels to avert the most catastrophic effects of climate change. The agreement requires all states to set regularly updated targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, for both the long and short term, and share their plans for reaching them.

What will be the impact on the Loss and Damage fund?

The US has also withdrawn from the board of the UN Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD). Set up after difficult negotiations at COP27 in 2022, the Fund is dedicated to helping low-income climate vulnerable nations and communities recover from climate change-related “unnatural” disasters. As of 19 November 2025, a total of US$817.01 million has been pledged to the FRLD, including US$17.5 million from the US. However, it is unclear if it will now honour that meagre pledge.

The FRLD’s board meeting in July 2026 is expected to focus on finalizing the operationalization of the fund. It is up to all countries that can, especially those most responsible for climate change, to step up and ensure the fund is adequately resourced. The less that countries contribute, especially historically high-emitting countries including the United States, the more it will cost in the long run for countries on the frontlines of climate harms to address climate change-related losses and damages.

What is Trump’s stand on climate change and how is it encouraging disinformation on climate science?

Trump called climate change a “scam” when he took to the floor of the UN General Assembly in 2025. He also called sustainable energy policies the “greatest hoax in history” at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2026.

A new report from the US Department of Energy says projections of future global warming are exaggerated. This is part of an effort by the Trump administration’s disinformation campaign to produce a false counter-narrative to global climate science and consensus, and to use this junk science as a justification for overturning climate regulation The US also cancelled a landmark climate change report, the sixth National Climate Assessment, and has taken down numerous webpages on climate science from official websites. The defenestration of these and other climate science programmes and institutions means less reliable information is available to the public and makes it harder for scientists around the world to fact check misleading information on climate change.

How has the US used bullying tactics to undermine global cooperation on climate and the environment?

Over 430 million tonnes of plastic is produced every year, most of it made from fossil fuels and quickly becoming waste that clogs up landfills or ends up in the oceans. Yet negotiations for a landmark Global Plastics Treaty failed to reach consensus last year as the US, along with other fossil fuel producing states, made it clear that it opposed cuts to plastic production.

The Trump administration has also successfully shelved a near-finalized global shipping carbon levy by threatening diplomats engaged in the negotiations and using threats to raise import tariffs to pressure nations.

Elsewhere, US lobbying pressure has greatly undermined the European Union’s corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD) which requires companies to fix human rights and environmental issues within their supply chains. The US has also actively sought alliances with political parties in Europe who are against climate action.

The purchase of US-produced so-called “natural” gas has been used as a bargaining chip in tariff negotiations; and US banks have retreated from climate action alliances.

What has been the impact of Trump’s anti-climate policies domestically?

The Trump administration has dismantled domestic climate action efforts and engaged in an unprecedented rollback of the regulations protecting people in the US from fossil fuel pollution and climate change.

He has gutted governmental agencies that provide emergency assistance to those harmed by extreme weather events made more likely and more intense by climate change; defunded diversity and climate programmes in US governmental agencies and universities resulting in mass layoffs, grant freezes, and attacks; increased taxpayer-funded subsidies to the fossil fuel industry; and threatened – in some cases successfully – US states with plans to reduce carbon emissions to end those policies. Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” approach has ramped up oil and gas production and fast-tracked deep-sea mining.

Since Trump returned to office, the US government has reduced the availability and collection of air pollution, weather and a host of other environmental and climate data that are used in the US and around the world. The administration has also directly threatened academic freedom and the right to access information, including on climate change, as part of a pattern consistent with rising authoritarian practices.  The US has also increased its military activities, particularly in Latin America and the Middle East, which have a heavy carbon footprint, not to mention the outrageous harm caused to human rights. In the instance of Venezuela, President Trump has cited the fossil fuel industry as part of his decision-making for unlawful action to remove Nicolas Maduro. 

How has Trump’s clampdown on civic space harmed climate activism?

The US government has cracked down on protest and dissent including by limiting climate activists’ ability to exercise their rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly through intimidation, demonization and threatened changes in laws.

The Energy Department has reportedly added “climate change,” “green” and “decarbonization” to its growing “list of words to avoid” . Climate activists have been described as “ecoterrorists” among other public attacks by the authorities. This has emboldened fossil fuel companies and other anti-climate action actors, and led to a growing threat of litigation against climate activists.

The Trump administration has also demonized marginalized populations, using racial rhetoric in ways that erode public support for essential public services — including those critical for helping Americans prepare for and withstand the impacts of climate change.

What should be done?

Climate change transcends borders and affects everyone, everywhere. It is often those least responsible that are hardest hit. Global cooperation is essential to equitably phase out fossil fuels, support a just transition for affected workers, protect vulnerable communities, and fund recovery from loss and damage. A fragmented approach will deepen climate harms like rising sea-levels, food scarcity, wildfires, extreme storms and floods, and lack of access to safe drinking water.

People and governments around the world must push back against all coercive efforts by the Trump administration. To cede ground now risks our collective future. Humanity must win.

Knowledge is power

Learn how you can take action against fossil fuels

People around the world are demanding the end of fossil fuels. Frontline communities are resisting and you can join them.

The post How is US President Trump impacting global climate action? appeared first on Amnesty International.