Cuba: Rejection of request to protest is yet another example of intolerance of freedom of expression

In light of the Cuban government’s negative response to requests from civil society to hold a Civic March for Change, planned for 15 November, to call for the release of activists detained for exercising their rights, including following the historic protests of 11 July, as well for human rights to be respected and for differences to be resolved through dialogue, Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International, said:

“Groups of people from various provinces around the country have been submitting requests in recent weeks to different local governments asking for authorization to carry out peaceful marches, organized in a clearly defined way in a legitimate exercise of their right to freedom of expression. Instead of guaranteeing these rights, President Miguel Díaz-Canel’s government has declared these civil society marches ‘illegal’ and ‘unconstitutional’, once again violating the right to peaceful protest in Cuba.”

The international community must not forget the hundreds of people detained during the historic protests on 11 July 2021 simply for peacefully exercising their right, as well as the six people named prisoner of conscience by Amnesty International shortly afterwards

Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director at Amnesty International

“Amnesty International has received reports that activists have been arbitrarily detained and that people who have responded to the Archipelago group’s calls to demonstrate have been harassed, intimidated and put under surveillance by members of the security forces. This response by the authorities is consistent with the policy of repression, applied for decades in Cuba, which criminalizes peaceful protest and imprisons and ill-treats Cubans from all walks of life solely for expressing their opinions. We will be monitoring the actions of the authorities, to denounce any act of repression against protesters.”

“The international community must not forget the hundreds of people detained during the historic protests on 11 July 2021 simply for peacefully exercising their right, as well as the six people named prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International shortly afterwards, as a symbolic gesture towards the many hundreds more who likely deserve this designation, who must be released immediately and unconditionally.”

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Duncan Tucker: duncan.tucker@amnesty.org

The post Cuba: Rejection of request to protest is yet another example of intolerance of freedom of expression appeared first on Amnesty International.

Israel/OPT: Designation of Palestinian civil society groups as terrorists a brazen attack on human rights

The Israeli Defense Ministry on 19 October 2021 issued a military order declaring six Palestinian civil society organizations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory to be “terrorist organizations.” The groups are Addameer, al-Haq, Defense for Children Palestine, the Union of Agricultural Work Committees, Bisan Center for Research and Development and the Union of Palestinian Women Committees.  The designation, made pursuant to a 2016 Israeli statute, effectively outlaws the activities of these civil society groups. It authorizes Israeli authorities to close their offices, seize their assets and arrest and jail their staff members, and it prohibits funding or even publicly expressing support for their activities.

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, who work closely with many of these groups, said in a joint statement:

“This appalling and unjust decision is an attack by the Israeli government on the international human rights movement. For decades, Israeli authorities have systematically sought to muzzle human rights monitoring and punish those who criticize its repressive rule over Palestinians. While staff members of our organizations have faced deportation and travel bans, Palestinian human rights defenders have always borne the brunt of the repression. This decision is an alarming escalation that threatens to shut down the work of Palestine’s most prominent civil society organizations. The decades-long failure of the international community to challenge grave Israeli human rights abuses and impose meaningful consequences for them has emboldened Israeli authorities to act in this brazen manner.

How the international community responds will be a true test of its resolve to protect human rights defenders. We are proud to work with our Palestinian partners and have been doing so for decades. They represent the best of global civil society. We stand with them in challenging this outrageous decision.”

The post Israel/OPT: Designation of Palestinian civil society groups as terrorists a brazen attack on human rights appeared first on Amnesty International.

100 Day Countdown

In September 2021, Amnesty International launched The 100 Day Countdown. Our campaign calls on states and pharmaceutical companies to share vaccines with low and lower-middle income countries, so that millions more people can be protected from Covid-19 in 2021.

More than 1.2 billion additional people in low and lower-middle income countries could be vaccinated by the end of the year, if rich countries and vaccine makers agreed to redistribute more fairly. Are they up to the challenge?

Background: Scandalous inequality

An end to the Covid-19 pandemic is in sight. For almost a year now, we have had the safe and effective vaccines we need to finally bring this virus under control.

But we won’t beat this pandemic until everyone has access to a vaccine. Not just people in rich countries, whose governments have struck deals with a handful of pharmaceutical companies – everyone. And right now, that moment is a long way off.

As of late October, 63% of people in high-income countries are fully vaccinated. But elsewhere it’s a very different story:

  • About half the global population has not received a single dose
  • Just 1.4% of people in low-income countries, and 17.5% in lower-middle income countries, are fully vaccinated
  • Only 2.8% of people in low-income countries have received at least one dose, and 35.6% in lower-middle income countries. In high-income countries, it’s 70.5%.

[* Source: Our World in Data. All figures as of 21 October 2021]

The unequal global roll-out of Covid-19 vaccines is a stark reminder of how the pandemic has magnified existing inequalities. While Europe, the US and a handful of other states emerged from lockdowns in the summer of 2021, parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America were plunged into renewed crises.

Meanwhile, the threat of new variants, which spread more easily among unvaccinated populations, remains. If we continue down our current path, the end of the pandemic will remain a glimmer on the horizon.

CHAGUANI, COLOMBIA – APRIL 08: Elvira Bermúdez, 90, receives the second dose of the Novavax vaccine in the kitchen of her house during the rural vaccination day on April 08, 2021 in Chaguani, Colombia

Who is responsible?

This shameful inequality, which is stalling our progress against Covid-19, was not inevitable. It is a manufactured crisis, brought about by the decisions key pharmaceutical companies and wealthy governments have made. There are enough vaccines to go round – but they’re not being shared.

Despite receiving billions of dollars in government funding, most pharmaceutical companies have insisted on maintaining control over production, which stunts the global supply of vaccines.

By refusing to waive intellectual property rights or share their technologies, most western vaccine developers have blocked other companies from manufacturing much-needed doses.

Intellectual property rights also mean companies can set the price of vaccines. Unsurprisingly, many have chosen to sell them at sky-high prices, mostly to wealthier countries.

Hoarding

Since the very beginning of the pandemic, wealthy states have been hoarding vaccines by buying up almost all the world’s supplies. Many now have a significant surplus of doses.

A conservative estimate by data science company Airfinity found that by the end of September 2021, wealthier states had more than 500 million excess vaccine doses in stock.

This includes:

  • 174 million+ among EU states
  • 160 million+ in the US
  • 140 million+ in China
  • 26 million+ in the UK
  • 16 million+ in Canada

These stockpiled doses are gathering dust while millions of at-risk people worldwide remain unprotected against Covid-19.

We can still fix this!

In July, a task force led by the World Health Organization (WHO) set a target to vaccinate 40% of people in every country by the end of 2021. But so far, less than 10% of people in low and lower-middle income countries are fully vaccinated.

On 21 September Amnesty International launched the 100 Day Countdown,  calling on states and pharmaceutical companies to take urgent action to meet that lifesaving target.

We calculated that if 2 billion vaccines were delivered to 82 low- and lower-middle income countries, an additional 1.2 billion people could be fully vaccinated by the end of 2021. That’s the number of vaccinations needed in for the WHO to meet its 40% target in these countries.

Airfinity estimates that between 100,000 and 225,000 lives can be saved for every 100 million doses delivered – meaning that meeting this target could save at least 2 million lives.

Amnesty found that this could be achieved if:

  • Pharmaceutical companies deliver 50% of vaccines they produce between 21 September and 31 December to low and lower-middle income countries. More than 2.6 billion vaccines could be provided in this way.
  • States redistribute the hundreds of millions of surplus vaccines currently in their stocks. Right now, more than 500 million vaccines could be made available immediately if Australia, Canada, China, the EU, Japan, UK, and US, redistributed their spare vaccines.

The World Health Organization and the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights have expressed strong support for the 100 Day Countdown. You can sign the petition here.

Is this realistic?

Our analysis showed that there are enough vaccines available to meet the 40% target, if states redistribute surplus doses, and companies prioritise deliveries to COVAX, the African Union and other mechanisms benefiting lower-income countries.

Many lower-middle income countries have already given one dose to over 20% of their populations – showing that systems are already in place in these countries. Others may need additional resources, support and time to be able to implement vaccine rollouts effectively – so it is also crucial that assistance is provided to ensure effective distribution systems.

What about people in wealthy countries who haven’t been vaccinated yet?

Given the high vaccination rates in higher-income countries, and the fact they have ordered many times more vaccines than required, redistributing doses should have no significant impact on vaccine access in these countries.

Countries with surplus vaccines have already inoculated the most at-risk people in their populations. Many are now giving booster jabs to these groups, and offering the vaccine to teenagers and schoolchildren. Meanwhile, in other countries, health workers, older people and those with serious health conditions are still waiting.

How much have pharma companies done to deliver vaccines more fairly?

WHO has set up a number of initiatives to encourage technology sharing and boost supply, but pharma companies have refused to join.

In June, WHO established the mRNA vaccine technology transfer hub in South Africa, so that African manufacturers can make mRNA vaccines like Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna’s. But these companies have refused to participate – despite knowing full well that doing so could save tens of thousands of lives.

Nor have any of these companies joined the Covid-19 Technology Access Pool (CTAP), established to support the sharing of open and non-exclusive licences. They have also lobbied aggressively against proposals to temporarily lift intellectual property rights, such as the WTO TRIPS Waiver proposed by India and South Africa.

Amnesty International launched a report in September 2021 about vaccine inequality. Among our key findings:

  • Pfizer and BioNTech had so far delivered nine times more vaccines to Sweden alone than to all low-income countries combined.
  • Moderna had not yet delivered a single vaccine dose to a low-income country and had provided just 12% of its vaccines to lower-middle income countries.
  • AstraZeneca delivered the most vaccines to lower income countries, sold at cost price, and had issued some voluntary licenses to other manufacturers. However, it has refused to share its technology with WHO initiatives, and has opposed the WTO TRIPS Waiver.

We need to end vaccine inequality now

Redistributing vaccines will save countless lives lives. It will make all of us safer, because global vaccination will reduce the likelihood of dangerous variants developing. The longer we wait, the more time the virus has to mutate.

States and pharma companies hold millions of lives in their hands. With enough pressure we can ensure they respect everyone’s human rights, no matter where they live.

There is no more time to waste. No one should spend another year living without access to these life-saving vaccines.

The post 100 Day Countdown appeared first on Amnesty International.

Syria: Chilling execution spree with 24 people put to death over last year’s wildfires

Syrian authorities have executed 24 people accused of involvement in igniting the wildfires that ravaged the country last year. In a Facebook post on 21 October, the Syrian Ministry of Justice described the 24 men as “criminals who carried out terrorist attacks that led to deaths and damage to infrastructure and public property”. It also said 11 others were sentenced to life in prison in the same case and nine, including five children, received prison sentences.

Responding to the news, Lynn Maalouf, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International, said:

“The Syrian state has embarked on a horrifying execution spree which exposes its callous disregard for the right to life and contempt for international law. Our research over the years has shown that death sentences are often passed after secret trials without the most basic fair trial guarantees or based on torture-tainted confessions. The death penalty is a cruel punishment and can never be justified – no matter the offence.

“The Syrian authorities should immediately impose a moratorium on the death penalty and work towards its complete abolition. They should also ensure that all criminal procedures and trials follow international standards of fairness.”

Background

Executions are common in war-torn Syria, although the government tries to keep them behind closed doors. Until this day, the Syrian Penal Code allows for the death penalty and Syria remains a retentionist state.

In 2017, Amnesty International exposed the Syrian government’s campaign of extrajudicial executions by mass hangings at Saydnaya Prison. Before they were hanged, the victims were condemned to death in flagrantly unfair and shambolic “trials” at the Military Field Court located in Damascus, which lasted between one and three minutes. Between 2011 and 2015, as many as 13,000 people, most of them civilians believed to be opposed to the government, were hanged in secret at Saydnaya.

The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception, regardless of the nature or circumstances of the crime; guilt, innocence, or other characteristics of the individual; or the method used to carry out the execution.

The post Syria: Chilling execution spree with 24 people put to death over last year’s wildfires appeared first on Amnesty International.

Italy: Health and care workers face reprisals for speaking out during Covid-19 pandemic

Health and care workers in Italy who raised concerns about poor and unsafe working conditions in care homes during the Covid-19 pandemic were subjected to unfair disciplinary proceedings and feared retribution from their employers, new research from Amnesty International has found.

Instead of addressing their health and safety concerns over issues such as the use of personal protective equipment and the true number of Covid cases in care homes, employers silenced these workers, often through unfair dismissal, and targeted them with anti-union measures.

“Health and care workers were on the frontline of the fight against COVID-19. They were feted by the Italian government for their hard work in horrendous circumstances. Yet those same workers were silenced by their employers when they tried to raise concerns about their patients’, and their own, safety,”

Marco Perolini, Western Europe Researcher at Amnesty International

Amnesty International researchers spoke to 34 health and care professionals between February and August 2021 who worked in care homes during the pandemic, as well as trade unionists, lawyers and legal experts. The interviews paint a picture of a highly-feminized sector under strain from understaffing, low wages and precarious working conditions compounded by the worst pandemic in a century.

The pandemic has taken a huge toll on staff in Italy’s care homes, 85% of whom are women. According to official statistics, 65.6% of the overall number of workers who contracted Covid-19 in the workplace in Italy were health and care workers. Nearly a quarter of the workers who died after contracting the virus in the workplace were health workers and care home staff.

Disciplinary and anti-union measures

A third of the workers whom Amnesty International spoke to raised concerns about a climate of fear and retaliation in their workplace. Lawyers reported more than a dozen cases of disciplinary proceedings and dismissals targeting workers, including union representatives who raised concerns regarding the lack of adequate health and safety measures in different care homes.

In December 2020, the Milan Employment Tribunal found that Piero, a trade unionist and a nurse, had been unfairly dismissed by a large care home in Milan that employed him because of his union-related activities. Piero had raised concerns regarding the high mortality rate among the older people who lived in the care home. After receiving seven disciplinary warnings for having spoken out, in November 2020, he was suspended from work for a month. “Cooperatives and public care homes have put a muzzle on people who have reported or talked to the press,” said ‘Marco’, an outsourced nurse who works in a private care home in Lombardy.

Italy’s 2017 whistleblower law protects people who reveal wrongdoing in the workplace. However, it does not guarantee adequate protection of workers, for example in terms of confidentiality and independence, in the private sector, which covers 73% of the care homes in Italy. Italian authorities must protect the rights of all care workers from abuse by the private sector.

Care sector shaken by deaths

More than 130,200 people had died of Covid-19 in Italy before 29 September 2021, more than 95% of them older than 60 years of age. Some estimates suggest that 8.5% of all the older people living in care homes in Italy died in the first months of the pandemic.

In December 2020, Amnesty International highlighted the failure of the Italian authorities to put in place adequate policies to protect older people living in care homes, including their rights to life, to health and to be free from discrimination.

While the vaccination campaign, which prioritized care home residents as well as health and care workers, resulted in a decrease in morbidity and mortality among both older people and workers in care homes, long-standing concerns in the sector, including low wages, the over-representation of women in a sector with poor working conditions, remain unaddressed.

Independent inquiry urgently needed

The Italian authorities must ensure that these workers’ voices are heard.

Amnesty International is calling on the Italian parliament to set up an independent committee of inquiry to investigate the authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic with a specific focus on care homes. While some proposals are in initial stages, no inquiry has yet been approved.

Any such committee must also consider the serious concerns raised by workers and unions regarding health, safety and poor working conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic and preceding it.

“It is vital that the Italian parliament approves an independent inquiry so that lessons can be learned, similar mistakes can be prevented and justice can be provided to those people who died unnecessarily and those who were wrongly dismissed,” said Debora Del Pistoia, researcher at Amnesty International Italy.

A global trend of repression

The silencing of care and health workers in Italy is part of an alarming global trend as we have seen authorities violating freedom of expression worldwide during the pandemic. Health and care workers have been targeted for speaking out in countries such as Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact:    

Alison Abrahams on alison.abrahams@amnesty.org or +32 483 680 812    

Out of hours contact details    

+44 20 7413 5566    

email: press@amnesty.org     

twitter: @amnestypress  

The post Italy: Health and care workers face reprisals for speaking out during Covid-19 pandemic appeared first on Amnesty International.