A change based on justice

The Chilean Attorney General’s Office is continuing investigations, seemingly now very seriously, into several current and former Chilean public officials including the former president Sebastián Piñera, the former General Director of the Carabineros (Chilean National police), Mario Rozas, and the current General Director under the administration of President Boric, Ricardo Yáñez, for their alleged actions or omissions during the police violence in the mass protests in 2019.

The inquiries are based on three charges: one for crimes against humanity and two others for generalized torture (unlawful coercion) against protesters during the period of social unrest. These investigations are in line with the findings of Amnesty International’s report Eyes on Chile: Police violence and command responsibility during the period of social unrest. At the time, Chile made world news for holding, in record time, the grim title of country with the highest number of people with eye injuries caused by police officers.

What started as isolated protests in Santiago very quickly turned into mass demonstrations throughout the whole country demanding quality education and public health, social security, and decent work. Social unrest that had been building up for decades exploded in an unexpected way. However, the actions of the police were even more unexpected.

What started as isolated protests in Santiago very quickly turned into mass demonstrations throughout the whole country demanding quality education and public health, social security, and decent work

Carabineros and the government of then President Sebastián Piñera made every effort to portray the demonstrations as acts of vandalism that warranted the use of force due to “serious breach of the peace” and “attacks on public and private property”. The use of Molotov cocktails or stones against the police, despite the fact that these were isolated incidents, was the straw that the authorities grasped at in order to justify their repression. Social media was flooded with images of police violence that was clearly excessive.

Between 18 October and 30 November alone, at least three people were killed by state agents and the number of people treated in emergency departments reached 12,500, according to the Ministry of Health.

The Carabineros and the government decided to ignore the fact that international human rights law and Chilean national law prioritize the protection of people over the protection of material objects for one simple reason: the value of life is greater than the value of objects, which, unlike life, can be restored.

Disregarding that premise led to disaster, and the Attorney General’s Office and the Judicial Branch may now consider this criminal conduct on the part of National Police commanders who allowed it to happen.

Among the most serious conduct attributed to the Chilean police, the use of shotguns loaded with highly injurious ammunition and concealed by the official narrative as ‘rubber bullets’ stood out. These were cartridges containing 12 pellets consisting of a rubber and metal alloy that penetrates the skin, which are impossible to aim and which the Carabineros fired indiscriminately. Rubber bullets, the use of which should be exceptional, must always be directed at a single person and only if that person puts the life or safety of another person at risk.

Despite the evidence and the number of injuries increasing day by day, the authorities, including Carabinero commanders, wasted their breath insisting that the bullets they used were made of rubber, because that is how they appeared in the purchase orders. This is akin to claiming that a tiger is a cat simply because the person selling it says that it is.

One of the greatest tragedies was the number of people who suffered eye injuries, mostly due to this ammunition fired from Hatsan Escort shotguns. In a month and a half, almost 350 people, most of them young people, unjustifiably acquired a lifelong disability.

One of the greatest tragedies was the number of people who suffered eye injuries

In a continent that has seen numerous outbursts of public unrest over the last five years as a result of disillusionment with leaders and their policies due to impunity, corruption, and lack of opportunity in the face of the wealth of the few, Chile could be the example that the Americas needs, proving that demanding rights is worth the effort and worthy of respect.

No society can move in the right direction without justice. To do so at the expense of the suffering of the victims would be to build change on shaky foundations. This is why, as part of this change, it is essential to make progress in the investigations and subsequent criminal proceedings against all those who may be responsible for the injuries, aftereffects, and the pain of so many others who fought to make Chile a better country.

In the report Eyes on Chile, Amnesty International called for the investigation of Carabinero strategic commanders, at least the then General Director, Deputy General Director and Director of Order and Security. The time has come for the Attorney General’s Office to decide whether to apply, with sufficient and admissible evidence to do so, for indictment, and for justice to move forward.

The post A change based on justice appeared first on Amnesty International.

Saudi Arabia: Quash sentences for Egyptian Nubians who organized peaceful remembrance event

Responding to the news that Saudi Arabia’s Specialized Criminal Court (SCC) has sentenced 10 Egyptian Nubian men to between 10 and 18 years in prison for organizing a peaceful remembrance event, Diana Semaan, Amnesty International’s Acting Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa, said:

“Sentencing these men to over a decade in prison simply for organizing a peaceful community event makes a mockery of justice. They should never have been arrested in the first place, let alone prosecuted by the notorious Specialized Criminal Court. Their sentences must be quashed, and they must be immediately and unconditionally released. They had already spent almost 16 months detained without charge and faced a multitude of gross violations in unfair trials simply for exercising their human rights.

Sentencing these men to over a decade in prison simply for organizing a peaceful community event makes a mockery of justice.

Diana Semaan, Amnesty International

“The Saudi authorities must also ensure they have full access to medical care pending their release, especially the older men who are suffering from serious health problems like diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

“Saudi Arabia continues to stifle the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly while presenting a facade of progressive reforms. The authorities must urgently protect the rights of all people in the country to freely express themselves individually and collectively, including of ethnic minorities.”

Background

The 10 men were initially arrested on 25 October 2019 shortly before attending their own remembrance event focusing on the 1973 Arab-Israeli war.

On 25 December 2019, the men were released without charge yet handed travel bans pending the case’s resumption. They were then re-arrested in July 2020 and detained incommunicado with no access to their lawyers or relatives for the first two months of their detention.

The 10 detained Egyptian Nubian men are Adel Ibrahim Faqir, Dr. Farjallah Ahmed Youssef, Jamal Abdullah Masri, Mohamed Fathallah Gomaa, Sayyed Hashem Shater, Ali Gomaa Ali Bahr, Saleh Gomaa Ahmed, Abdulsalam Gomaa Ali Bahr, Abdullah Gomaa Ali and Wael Ahmed Hassan Ishaq. The men are all members of informal Nubian community associations.

On 10 November 2021, at their first hearing before the SCC, they were allowed to meet their lawyer for the first time in almost 16 months.

On 10 October 2022, they were sentenced under Saudi’s Counter-Terrorism Law on charges of establishing an association without a license, posting on social media, and showing solidarity with the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni Islamist organization which is outlawed in Saudi Arabia. According to one of the men’s relatives, their families were prevented from attending the sentencing hearing.

The post Saudi Arabia: Quash sentences for Egyptian Nubians who organized peaceful remembrance event appeared first on Amnesty International.

Silence is King: The persecution of activists in the Gulf


Since at least 2011, several GCC states have slapped peaceful critics and activists with arbitrary arrests, torture or other ill-treatment, trials that fell short of fair trial standards, and lengthy sentences; they have harassed their family members, imposed travel bans, basically rendering the life of any person wishing to peacefully express any independent opinion impossible.

Today, across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, at least 75 individuals are behind bars, imprisoned solely for exercising their legitimate right to freedom of expression, freedom of association or their freedom of assembly. These are cases that Amnesty International has documented through the course of its ongoing monitoring and documentation and this tally is not reflective as such of the full scale of such arrests and prosecutions.

They are being made to sacrifice years of their lives for having advocated for change and reform. Their imprisonment has not only silenced them, but its chilling effect has also effectively spread across the region, where very little, if no space at all, is left for any freedom of speech.

All #PrisonersOfConscience in the #Gulf must be immediately & unconditionally released @KingSalman @BahrainCPnews @KBKAlThani @MohamedBinZayed

Speaking up right now in Bahrain is what courage looks like. The regime has obliterated civil society space and made sure there’s no space for freedom of expression

Maryam al-Khawaja, daughter of AbdulHadi al-Khawaja

Silencing voices across GCC states

Bahrain

Rather than addressing the drivers of the 2011 protests, which they had promised to do in the wake of these protests and a moment of acute international scrutiny, Bahraini authorities have instead moved in the past decade to further marginalize Shia citizens, who composed the bulwark of political opposition in the Kingdom. This marginalization took many forms such as outlawing their main political parties and social groups, subjecting hundreds to mass trials and stripping them of their nationality, and tightening state control over their religious practices and over opportunities for higher education.

Bahrain has by now suppressed most of Shia civil society and taken legal action against the most prominent opposition leaders in the country, including imprisoning the leaders of the 2011 protests. In 2016, the authorities dissolved the main opposition group, al-Wefaq National Islamic Society (al-Wefaq), and the opposition political party Waad. In June 2017, al-Wasat, the only independent media outlet in Bahrain was shut down. This meant that an important journalistic voice from Shia civil society that had called for peaceful change in Bahrain was silenced. The authorities continue to restrict the registration of local NGOs and have blocked the website of the Bahrain Centre for Human Rights (BCHR) in Bahrain since 2006.

Today, at least 12 Bahraini activists remain behind bars, serving up to life sentences in jail.

Qatar

Freedom of expression is restricted including by vaguely worded law criminalizing a broad range of speech and publishing. The authorities have exercised arbitrary executive powers, placing administrative sanctions such as travel bans on individuals without judicial process, in some cases seemingly as punishment for their political opinions or peaceful activities. In May 2022, two lawyersand members of the Al Murra tribe, were convicted and sentenced to life in prison on charges including contesting laws ratified by the Emir and organizing unauthorized public meetings.

Saudi Arabia

Despite the Saudi Arabian authorities’ rhetoric about reforms, they have unleashed an intense crackdown on citizens promoting change in the last few years. There has been an unprecedented crackdown on freedom of expression, targeting the human rights community as well as a wide range of individuals who have expressed any form of criticism in Saudi Arabia.

One of the instruments of that repression has been the Specialized Criminal Court (SCC), which was set up in 2008 to try individuals accused of terror-related crimes. Amongst those the court has prosecuted are human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists, religious clerics and political activists, including Shi’a activists from Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.

In addition to prosecutions as a tool to muzzle dissent, the authorities resort to a range of other tools to maintain their clampdown. One of these is the use of prolonged travel bans– handed down either as part of sentences or arbitrarily without any official justification – which effectively obstruct fundamental life choices like career and education, and prevent activists from reuniting with their families abroad once they have been released from detention

United Arab Emirates (UAE)

Since 2012, over 60 individuals have been detained in relation to the peaceful exercise of their rights to freedom of expression including in what is known as the UAE 94 mass trial. So far only one of the UAE 94 men was released and the other men – sentenced to between seven and ten years in prison during the UAE 94 mass trial – remained arbitrarily detained past the completion of their sentences without legal justification.  

UAE authorities restrict freedom of expression, taking measures to silence its critics including on social and political issues. In 2017, Ahmed Mansoor, the last man to freely criticize the authorities publicly from within the country, was arrested and subjected to another unfair trial.

In July 2021, the Pegasus Projectrevealed the massive scale and breadth of abuse facilitated by cybersurveillance company NSO Group and its state clients. The project revealed that scores of journalists, activists, and politicians around the world were unlawfully surveilled in violation of their human rights. Media organizations noted the UAE as a potential client state of NSO Group

How do these states exercise their silencing and restrictions?

Here are some examples:

  • Resort to vaguely worded laws and far-reaching provisions in the Penal Codes, Criminal Procedure Laws, Cybercrime and other laws to detain, try and sentence individuals
  • Equate peaceful political activities with threats to state security
  • Severely restrict public gatherings and demonstrations
  • Ban and disband independent NGOs and political opposition groups
  • Silence and lock up the founders of independent NGOs.
  • Use of cybersurveillance as a tool of repression

Meet some of the peaceful activists currently detained in the GCC

Take action

AbdulJalil al-Singace

He must be immediately and unconditionally released, and pending that, granted immediate access to any necessary medical care

Salma al-Shehab

Her conviction must be quashed and she must be immediately and unconditionally released

Hazza and Rashed bin Ali Abu Shurayda al-Marri

Their convictions and life sentences must be quashed and they must be immediately released

PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD STANDING IN SOLIDARITY WITH GULF PRISONERS OF CONSCIENCE

In 2020, Amnesty International along with partner NGOs and activists
called for the release of prisoners in the Gulf –
some of which have since been released.

All #PrisonersOfConscience in the #Gulf must be immediately & unconditionally released @KingSalman @BahrainCPnews @KBKAlThani @MohamedBinZayed

The post Silence is King: The persecution of activists in the Gulf appeared first on Amnesty International.

Russian attacks on Kyiv and cities across Ukraine are an escalation of aggression and apparent violations of laws of war

Reacting to reported Russian mass strikes on Kyiv and several other Ukrainian cities, Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said:

“This is yet another day of petrifying news from Ukraine, with Russia launching multiple strikes that hit residential areas, city centres and civilian infrastructure. The crater left by a Russian missile in the middle of children’s playground in central Kyiv is a stark symbol of the complete disregard for human life that has characterized Russia’s invasion.”

“The ultimate goal of today’s attacks is to spread terror among the entire civilian population.

The ultimate goal of today’s attacks is to spread terror among the entire civilian population

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“Russia must immediately stop its war of aggression. All those responsible for the aggression and war crimes, including commanders and civilian leaders, such as ministers, and heads of state should be held criminally responsible for their actions.”

Background

In the early hours and morning of 10 October, Russian forces carried out massive missile strikes on Kyiv and several other Ukrainian cities, including Dnipro, Zaporizhzhya, and Zhytomyr, among others. According to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, around 40 rockets fired by Russian forces hit targets in Ukraine.

Critical infrastructure facilities like power plants and power substations in eight regions of Ukraine and in Kyiv seem to be the main targets of the attacks, which led to mass power shortages across the country and many train delays. According to Ukraine’s national police, out of 117 buildings damaged throughout the country 29 were critical infrastructure facilities, four were multi-storey buildings and 35 private residential houses.

While Kyiv was one of the first targets at the start of the of the full-scale invasion by Russia, this is the first time its historic centre has been hit. Four Kyiv city districts came under attacks that damaged, among others, one of the buildings of the Kyiv National Shevchenko University, a pedestrian bridge and a playground in Shevchenko Park.

While Kyiv was one of the first targets at the start of the of the full-scale invasion by Russia, this is the first time its historic centre has been hit

According to the State Service of Emergency Situations, today’s attacks killed 11 people (five in Kyiv) and injured 89 across the country.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin welcomed the attacks, claiming them to be targeting “energy facilities, military administration and communications of Ukraine.”

Accountability for war crimes 

Since the beginning of the conflict, Amnesty International has been documenting Russian war crimes and other violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed during Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine. All of Amnesty International’s outputs published to date – including news updates, reports, briefings and investigations – can be found here.  

Amnesty International has called repeatedly for members of Russian forces and officials responsible for the aggression and violations to be held to account, and has welcomed the ongoing International Criminal Court investigation in Ukraine. Comprehensive accountability in Ukraine will require the concerted efforts of the UN and its organs, as well as initiatives at the national level pursuant to the principle of universal jurisdiction. 

The post Russian attacks on Kyiv and cities across Ukraine are an escalation of aggression and apparent violations of laws of war appeared first on Amnesty International.

Human rights defenders from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine win the Nobel Peace Prize

Responding to the news that human rights organisations from Ukraine and Russia, as well as rights advocate Ales Bialiatski of Belarus, have been awarded this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said:

“The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to human rights defenders and organizations from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine highlights the vital role they play in defending human rights in their countries and the wider region.”

“The Nobel Committee is sending an important message to the world – that it must support human rights defenders that have shown an outstanding effort to document war crimes, human rights abuses and the abuse of power in their countries. This message is sent at a critical moment when ongoing Russian aggression has led to a human rights crisis of incredible proportions in Ukraine, and of the crackdown on any form of dissent in Russia and Belarus.

“This is also a message of solidarity. Since July 2021 Ales Bialiatski, a pioneer of human rights in Belarus since the mid-1980’s, has been behind bars for his peaceful work documenting, among other things, the crackdown on dissent following the disputed 2020 presidential elections. Memorial, one of the oldest Russian human rights organisations, was shut down by the Russian authorities at the end of 2021, and the Center for Civil Liberties has been documenting Russian war crimes in Ukraine since 2014 and continues its work in Ukraine despite the ongoing Russian war of aggression.

“Amnesty International stands in solidarity with Ales Bialiatski, Memorial and the Center for Civil Liberties. All three are an inspiration and an example of courage and dedication for all those who carry out human rights work in Eastern Europe.”

Amnesty International stands in solidarity with Ales Bialiatski, Memorial and the Center for Civil Liberties. All three are an inspiration and an example of courage and dedication for all those who carry out human rights work in Eastern Europe

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

Background 

Ales Bialiatski, the chairman and founder of the Human Rights Centre Viasna in 1996, is held in a pre-trial detention centre since July 2021. Along with his fellow colleagues, Viasna vice-chair Valyantsin Stefanovich and the organization’s lawyer Uladzimir Labkovich, he’s falsely charged with “smuggling of large sums of money and financing group activities that grossly violated public order” as retaliation for his lawful human rights work.

Between 2011 and 2014, Ales Bialiatski served a sentence on trumped up charges of tax evasion. Then, as now, Amnesty International recognises him as a prisoner of conscience.

Memorial is one of the oldest and most respected human rights groups in Russia that started operating in 1988. The Soviet dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner Andrei Sakharov was the first chair of Memorial until his death in 1989. Memorial was liquidated by a court order in December 2021 on grounds of violation of the now infamous “foreign agents” law. The Russian authorities labelled Memorial a ‘foreign agent’ in 2013. Currently, Memorial continues operating without official registration.

The Center for Civil Liberties, founded in Ukraine in 2007, is currently playing a critical role in efforts to identify and document war crimes committed in Ukrainian territory under effective Russian control since 2014 and occupied during the 2022 invasion.

The post Human rights defenders from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine win the Nobel Peace Prize appeared first on Amnesty International.